The ordinary language argument against skepticism—pragmatized
- 324 Downloads
I develop a new version of the ordinary language response to skepticism. My version is based on premises about the practical functions served by our epistemic words. I end by exploring how my argument against skepticism is interestingly non-circular and philosophically valuable.
KeywordsSkepticism Ordinary language Function Ambitious anti-skeptical project
For their help with this paper I’d like to thank audiences at Arizona State University, Georgia State University, the University of Miami, the University of Nebraska, TEX (the Texas Epistemology Xtravaganza), and the 2018 Pacific APA where Jennifer Nagel gave valuable comments. I’m especially grateful to Yuval Avnur for extensive discussions about the ordinary language argument.
- Austin, J. L. (1946/1961). Other minds. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical papers (pp. 76–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Avnur, Y. (ms.). Justification as a loaded notion.Google Scholar
- Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the state of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dogramaci, S. (2015b). Forget and forgive: A practical approach to forgotten evidence. Ergo, 2(26), 645–677.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, G. (2015). Teleologies and the methodology of epistemology. In D. Henderson & J. Greco (Eds.), Epistemic evaluation: Purposeful epistemology (pp. 31–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hannon, M. (forthcoming). What’s the point of knowledge? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hookway, C. (2016). Pragmatism. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/pragmatism/.
- Kaplan, M. (2008). Austin’s way with skepticism. In J. Greco (Ed.), The Oxford companion to skepticism (pp. 348–371). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Malcolm, N. (1942). Moore and ordinary language. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of G. E. Moore (Vol. 1, pp. 343–368). La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nagel, J. (2013). Knowledge as a mental state. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 4, 273–308.Google Scholar
- Rinard, S. (forthcoming). Reasoning one’s way out of skepticism. In K. McCain & T. Poston (Eds.), The mystery of skepticism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century, volume 2: The age of meaning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sober, E. (2000). The philosophy of biology (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- von Frisch, K. (1967). The dance language and orientation of the bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wright, L. (1976). Teleological explanations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar