Advertisement

Sense, reference and substitution

  • Jeremy Goodman
  • Harvey LedermanEmail author
Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

We show that, contrary to conventional wisdom, Frege’s distinction between sense and reference does not reconcile a classical logic of identity with apparent counterexamples to it involving proper names embedded under propositional attitude verbs.

Keywords

Sense Reference Substitution Frege’s puzzle Frege Attitude reports 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dave Chalmers, Cian Dorr, Kyle Landrum, Robbie Williams, Jack Woods and especially an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Bacon, A., & Russell, J. S. (2017). The logic of opacity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Google Scholar
  2. Caie, M., Goodman, J., Lederman, H. (forthcoming). Classical opacity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity: A study in semantics and modal logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dorr, C. (2014). Transparency and the context-sensitivity of attitude reports. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & G. Martí (Eds.), Empty representations: Reference and non-existence (pp. 25–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50. Translated as “On sense and reference” by Max Black in Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209–230 (1948).Google Scholar
  6. Heck, R. K., & May, R. (2018). Truth in Frege. In M. Glanzberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of truth (pp. 193–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, D. (1968). Quantifying in. Synthese, 19, 178–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kripke, S. A. (2011). Frege’s theory of sense and reference: Some exegetical notes. In Philosophical troubles (pp. 254–291). Oxford University Press, 2011 [2008]. First published in Theoria, 74(3), 181–218.Google Scholar
  9. von Fintel, K. (1999). NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2), 97–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations