Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 176, Issue 11, pp 2991–3017 | Cite as

Panpsychism, intuitions, and the great chain of being

  • Luke RoelofsEmail author
  • Jed Buchanan
Article
  • 236 Downloads

Abstract

Some philosophical theories of consciousness imply consciousness in things we would never intuitively think are conscious—most notably, panpsychism implies that consciousness is pervasive, even outside complex brains. Is this a reductio ab absurdum for such theories, or does it show that we should reject our original intuitions? To understand the stakes of this question as clearly as possible, we analyse the structured pattern of intuitions that panpsychism conflicts with (what we call the ‘Great Chain of Being’ intuition). We consider a variety of ways that the tension between this intuition and panpsychism (or other counter-intuitive theories) could be resolved, ranging from complete rejection of the theory to complete dismissal of the intuition, but argue in favour of more nuanced approaches which try to reconcile the two.

Keywords

Panpsychism Intuitions Consciousness Other minds Animal ethics 

References

  1. Aaronson, S. (2014a). Why I am not an integrated information theorist. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1799. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  2. Aaronson, S. (2014b). Giulio Tononi and me: A Phi-nal exchange. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1823. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  3. Aristotle. (c. 350 BCE). Historia animalium.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
  5. Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., & Owen, A. (2016). Are there levels of consciousness? Trends Cogn Sci., 20(6), 405–413.Google Scholar
  6. Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201–240). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Bentham, J. (1996). In J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart (Eds.), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (originally published 1789).Google Scholar
  8. Block, N. (1992). Troubles with functionalism. In C. W. Savage (Ed.), Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press ((1978). Reprinted with revisions In B. Beakley and P. Ludlow (Eds.), The philosophy of mind: Classical problems/contemporary issues. MIT Press).Google Scholar
  9. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227–287.Google Scholar
  10. Block, N. (2002). The harder problem of consciousness. The Journal of Philosophy, 49, 1–35.Google Scholar
  11. Callicott, J. Baird. (1984). Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(4), 299–309.Google Scholar
  12. Callicott, J. Baird. (1989). In defense of the land ethic. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232–1254.Google Scholar
  14. Cappelen, Herman. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carey, Susan. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind: An integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Carruthers, P., & Schechter, E. (2006). Can panpsychism bridge the explanatory gap? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(10–11), 32–39.Google Scholar
  18. Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.Google Scholar
  19. Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chalmers, D. (2014). Comment 36 on Aaronson 2014-b. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1823#comment-108216. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  21. Chalmers, D. (2014b). Intuitions in philosophy: A minimal defence. Philosophical Studies, 171(3), 535–544.Google Scholar
  22. Chalmers, D. (2015). Panpsychism and panprotopsychism. In Y. Nagasawa & T. Alter (Eds.), Consciousness in the physical world: Essays on Russellian monism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Chalmers, D. (2018). The meta-problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(9–10), 1–41.Google Scholar
  24. Christian List. (2018). What is it like to be a group agent? Noûs, 52(2), 295–319.Google Scholar
  25. Clifford, W. K. (1897). Body and mind. Lectures and essays by William Kingdon Clifford’, V1, by Clifford, William Kingdon, 1845–1879; Stephen, Leslie, Sir, 1832–1904; Pollock (pp. 1845–1937). Sir: Frederick.Google Scholar
  26. Cottingham, J. (1978). A brute to the brutes? Philosophy, 53(206), 551–559.Google Scholar
  27. Dennett, D. (1976). Are dreams experiences? The Philosophical Review, 85(2), 151–171.Google Scholar
  28. Dennett, D. (1986). Julian Jaynes’s software archeology. Canadian Psychology, 27(2), 149–154.Google Scholar
  29. Descartes, Letter To Plempius, 3 October 1637 (AT I 415; K 37); and Letter to More of 5 February 1649: AT V 276; K 243 (‘K’ stands for A. Kenny, Descartes’ Letters Philosophical (Oxford: Clarendon, 1970)).Google Scholar
  30. Descartes, The Second Meditation, CSM II 18; AT VII 27. My references here are to The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated and edited by Cottingham, Stoothoff and Murdoch (CSM), Cambridge, 1984 and to the Oeuvres de Descartes, edited by Ch. Adam and P. Tannery (AT), revised edition, Vrin, 1964–76.Google Scholar
  31. Donaldson, B. (2015). Creaturely cosmologies: Why metaphysics matters for animal and planetary liberation. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  32. Gennaro, R. (2012). Consciousness. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/consciou/.
  33. Goff, P. (2013). Orthodox property dualism + linguistic theory of vagueness = panpsychism. In R. Brown (Ed.), Consciousness inside and out: Phenomenology, neuroscience, and the nature of experience (pp. 75–91). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Goff, P. (2015). Real acquaintance and physicalism. In P. Coates & S. Coleman (Eds.), Phenomenal qualities: Sense, perception, and consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Goff, P. (Forthcoming). Galileo’s error.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130.Google Scholar
  37. Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Haslanger, (1995). Ontology and social construction. Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 95–125.Google Scholar
  39. Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) Do we want them to be? Nous, 34(1), 31–55.Google Scholar
  40. Heal, J. (2003). Mind, reason and imagination. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hyslop, A., & Jackson, F. (1972). The analogical inference to other minds. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9(2), 168–176.Google Scholar
  42. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Jaynes, J. (2000) [1976]. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind (PDF). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kirk, R. (2003). Mind and body. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, A. (2018). Is consciousness inherently valuable? Philosophical Studies, 1–17.Google Scholar
  48. Leopold, Aldo. (1949). A sand county Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Lovejoy, A. (1964) [1936]. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ludwig, K. (2010). Intuitions and relativity. Philosophical Psychology, 23(4), 427–445.Google Scholar
  52. Maher, C. (2017). Plant minds: A philosophical defence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Matheson, Jonathan. (2016). Moral caution and the epistemology of disagreement. Journal of Social Philosophy, 47(2), 120–141.Google Scholar
  54. Matthews, F. (2003). For love of matter: A contemporary panpsychism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  55. Merricks, T. (2001). Objects and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Merricks, T. (2005). Composition and vagueness. Mind, 114, 615–637.Google Scholar
  57. Mill, J. S. (1889). An examination of sir William Hamilton’s philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings (6th ed.). London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green.Google Scholar
  58. Monti, M., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Coleman, M., Boly, M., Pickard, J., Tshibanda, L., et al. (2010). Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2010(362), 579–589.Google Scholar
  59. Mørch, H. H. (2014). Panpsychism and causation: A new argument and a solution to the combination problem. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  60. Mullin, A. (2011). Children and the argument from ‘marginal cases’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14(3), 291–305.Google Scholar
  61. Naci, L., Graham, M., Owen, A., & Weijer, C. (2017). Covert narrative capacity: Mental life in patients thought to lack consciousness. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 4(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
  62. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, V83, 435–450.Google Scholar
  63. Nagel, T. (2004). Panpsychism. In D. S. Clarke (Ed.), Panpsychism: Past and recent selected readings. Albany: State University of New York Press. (originally published Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  64. Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., & Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(5), e1003588.Google Scholar
  65. O’Leary-Hawthorne, J., & Michael, M. (1996). Compatibilist semantics in metaphysics: A case study. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 117–134.Google Scholar
  66. Owen, A., Coleman, M., Boly, M., Davis, M., Laureys, S., & Pickard, J. (2006). Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science, 313(5792), 1402.Google Scholar
  67. Peterson, A., & Bayne, T. (2018). Post-comatose disorders of consciousness. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), Routledge handbook of consciousness (pp. 351–365). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Regan, T. (1975). The moral basis of vegetarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5(2), 181–214.Google Scholar
  69. Regan, T. (1979). An examination and defense of one argument concerning animal rights. Inquiry, 22(1–4), 189–219.Google Scholar
  70. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). Tononi’s exclusion postulate would make consciousness (nearly) irrelevant. Blog post at The splintered mind. http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2014/07/tononis-exclusion-postulate-would-make.html. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  72. Seager, W. (1995). Consciousness, information and panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, V2–3, 272–288.Google Scholar
  73. Seager, W. (2006). The ‘Intrinsic Nature’ argument for Panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(10–11), 129–145.Google Scholar
  74. Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Shani, I. (2015). Cosmopsychism: A holistic approach to the metaphysics of experience. Philosophical Papers, 44(3), 389–437.Google Scholar
  76. Shea, N., & Bayne, T. (2010). The vegetative state and the science of consciousness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 459–484.Google Scholar
  77. Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  78. Steuber, K. (2006). Rediscovering empathy: Agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Strawson, G. (2006). Realistic monism: Why physicalism entails panpsychism. In A. Freeman (Ed.), Consciousness and its place in nature: Does physicalism entail panpsychism?. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  80. Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127, 109–166.Google Scholar
  81. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Thorp, J. (2016). Aristotle’s clivus naturae. Presentation at University of Western Ontario Arts & Humanities Research Day. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/philosophypres/12/. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  83. Tononi, G. (2012). Integrated information theory of consciousness: An updated account. Archive of Italian Biology, 150(2–3), 56–90.Google Scholar
  84. Tononi, G. (2014). Why Scott should stare at a blank wall and reconsider (or, the conscious grid). http://www.scottaaronson.com/tononi.docx. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
  85. Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49, 433–460.Google Scholar
  86. Unger, P. (1979). There are no ordinary things. Synthese, 41(2), 117–154.Google Scholar
  87. Van Cleve, J. (1990). Mind-dust or magic? Panpsychism versus emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, V4, 215–226.Google Scholar
  88. Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Vavova, K. (2015). Evolutionary debunking of moral realism. Philosophy Compass, 10(2), 104–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie IIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.CanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations