Philosophical Studies

, Volume 175, Issue 4, pp 981–988 | Cite as

Shoemaker’s responsibility pluralism: reflections on Responsibility from the Margins

  • Michael McKennaEmail author

David Shoemaker’s Responsibility from the Margins (Oxford University Press, 2015) is one of the most important books on the nature of responsibility written since H.L.A. Hart’s Punishment and Responsibility (1968). That’s a span of nearly half a century. Shoemaker wisely focuses on the nature of moral responsibility and sets aside a treatment of the control condition for it. While many books promise to treat moral responsibility thoroughly, most just focus upon the metaphysics of the control condition. So they are mostly about the metaphysics of agency. Shoemaker has made impressive progress by setting this debate aside and turning more directly to moral responsibility’s nature. In this respect, his book is of a piece with such important books as Hart’s, along with Jonathan Glover’s Responsibility (1970), and as well Michael Zimmerman’s An Essay on Moral Responsibility (Zimmerman 1988). That’s impressive company.

In what follows, I will raise four objections, but I hasten to add that...



For helpful advice, I would like to thank Phoebe Chan, Dana Nelkin, Paul Russell, Mark Timmons, Steve Wall, and Robert Wallace.


  1. Aristotle. (1954). The rhetoric and poetics of Aristotle. Transl. by W. Rhys Roberts. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  2. Glover, Jonathan. (1970). Responsibility. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. McKenna, Michael. (1998). The limits of evil and the role of moral address: A defense of strawsonian compatibilism. Journal of Ethics, 2, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McKenna, Michael. (2012). Conversation and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shoemaker, David. (2015). Responsibility from the Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Watson, Gary. (1987). Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. In Ferdinand Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Watson, Gary. (1996). Two faces of responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24(2), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wolf, Susan. (1990). Freedom within reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Zimmerman, Michael. J. (1988). An essay on moral responsibility. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations