Philosophical Studies

, Volume 175, Issue 3, pp 793–807 | Cite as

What is temporal ontology?

  • Natalja DengEmail author


Temporal ontology is the part of ontology involving the rival positions of presentism, eternalism, and the growing block theory. While this much is clear, it’s surprisingly difficult to elucidate the substance of the disagreement between presentists and eternalists (to focus on the most widespread positions). Certain events happened that are not happening now; what is it to disagree about whether these events exist (simpliciter, or else tenselessly)? In spite of widespread suspicion concerning the status and methods of analytic metaphysics, skeptics’ doubts about this debate have not generally been heeded, neither by metaphysicians, nor by philosophers of physics. This paper revisits the question in the light of prominent elucidation attempts from both camps (by Ted Sider, Christian Wüthrich, and Tom Stoneham). The upshot is that skeptics were right to be puzzled. The paper then explores a possible re-interpretation of positions in temporal ontology that links it to normative views about how we should live as temporal beings.


Eternalism Presentism Time Ontology Grounding Ideology 



Thanks to Jonathan Tallant, Giuliano Torrengo, David Ingram, Steven Savitt, Geurt Sengers, and audience members in Milan, Cambridge and Rotterdam for helpful comments on various drafts. This paper was written while I was a member of the TWCF project ‘Theology, philosophy of religion, and the sciences’.


  1. Balaguer, M. (2014). Anti-metaphysicalism, necessity, and temporal ontology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(1), 145–167.Google Scholar
  2. Callender, C. (2012). Time’s ontic voltage. In Bardon, A. (ed.), The future of the philosophy of time. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics; see also Callender, C. (forthcoming) What makes time special, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cockburn, D. (1997). Other times: Philosophical perspective on past, present and future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Deasy, D. (2015). What is presentism? Nous, 50(4), 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. Deng, N. (2013). Fine’s McTaggart, temporal passage, and the A versus B debate. Ratio, 26(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorato, M. (2009). The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime. In D. Dieks (Ed.), The ontology of spacetime, Vol. 1, philosophy and foundations of physics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Lombard, L. (2010). Time for a change: A polemic against the presentism/eternalism debate. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, & H. Silverstein (Eds.), Time and identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, U. (2005). The presentist’s dilemma. Philosophical Studies, 122(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mozersky, J. (2011). Presentism. In C. Callender (Ed.), The oxford handbook of philosophy of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Sakon, T. (2015). Presentism and the triviality objection. Philosophia, 43(4), 1089–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Savitt, S. (2011). Chronogeometrical determinism and the local present.
  13. Savitt, S. (2009). Presentism and eternalism in perspective. In D. Dieks (Ed.), The ontology of spacetime, Vol. 1, philosophy and foundations of physics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Setiya, K. (2014).The midlife crisis, Philosophers. Imprint, 14(31).Google Scholar
  15. Sider, T. (2011). Writing the book of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stoneham, T. (2009). Time and truth: The presentism–eternalism debate. Philosophy, 84(2), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tallant, J. (2012). (Existence) presentism and the A-theory. Analysis, 72(4), 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tallant, J. (2014). Defining existence presentism. Erkenntnis, 79(3), 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wüthrich, C. (2011). Demarcating presentism. In H. de Regt, S. Okasha, & S. Hartmann (Eds.), EPSA philosophy of science: Amsterdam 2009 (pp. 441–450). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Wüthrich, C. (2013). The fate of presentism in modern physics. In K. Miller & R. Ciuni (Eds.), New papers on the present. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Underwood International CollegeYonsei UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations