Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 174, Issue 7, pp 1721–1733 | Cite as

From Indian philosophy to cognitive neuroscience: two empirical case studies for Ganeri's Self

Commentary on Jonardon Ganeri’s The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, & the First-Person Stance
  • Jennifer M. WindtEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this commentary, I confront Ganeri’s theory of self with two case studies from cognitive neuroscience and interdisciplinary consciousness research: mind wandering and full-body illusions. Together, these case studies suggest new questions and constraints for Ganeri's theory of self. Recent research on spontaneous thought and mind wandering raises questions about the transition from unconscious monitoring to the phenomenology of ownership and the first-person stance. Full-body illusions are relevant for the attenuation problem of how we distinguish between self and others. Discussing these examples can help refine key transitions in Ganeri’s theory of self and ensure its empirical plausibility. This discussion also identifies points of contact between Ganeri's self and cognitive neuroscience, raising new questions for future research, both philosophical and empirical.

Keywords

Self-consciousness Attention Ownership Spontaneous thought Mind wandering Dreaming Full-body illusions Virtual reality 

References

  1. Aspell, J. E., Heydrich, L., Marillier, G., Lavanchy, T., Herbelin, B., & Blanke, O. (2013). Turning body and self inside out: Visualized heartbeats alter bodily self-consciousness and tactile percep-tion. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2445–2453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanke, O., & Metzinger, T. (2009a). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanke, O., & Metzinger, T. (2009b). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn Sci, 13(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hand “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casner, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). Vigilance impossible: Diligence, distraction, and daydreaming all lead to failures in a practical monitoring task. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., & Smith, R. (2011). The role of spontaneous thought in human cognition. In O. Vartanian & D. R. Mandel (Eds.), Neuroscience of decision making (pp. 259–284). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, O., Koppel, M., Malach, R., & Friedman, D. (2014). Controlling an avatar by thought using real-time fMRI. Journal of Neural Engineering, 11, 035006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng, Y.-Q., Li, S., & Tang, Y.-Y. (2014). The relationship between wandering mind, depression and mindfulness. Mindfulness, 5(2), 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317(5841), 1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farley, J., Risko, E., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention and lecture retention: The effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, K. C. R., Nijeboer, S., Solomonova, E., Domhoff, G. W., & Christoff, K. (2013). Dreaming as mind wandering: Evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 412.Google Scholar
  12. He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y. C., & McCarley, J. S. (2011). Mind wandering behind the wheel: Performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors, 53(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hohwy, J. (2010). The hypothesis testing brain: Some philosophical applications. In ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science, 135–144.Google Scholar
  14. Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irving, Z. C. (2016). Mind-wandering is unguided attention: accounting for the “purposeful” wanderer. Philosophical Studies, 173(2), 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madary, M., & Metzinger, T. K. (2016). Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. Recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metzinger, T. (2013). The myth of cognitive agency: Subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 931.Google Scholar
  21. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2016). Mind wandering minimizes mind numbing: Reducing semantic-satiation effects through absorptive lapses of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1273–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peck, T., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S., & Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If i were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e3832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pfeiffer, C., Lopez, C., Schmutz, V., Duenas, J. A., Martuzzi, R., Blanke, O., et al. (2013). Multisen-sory origin of the subjective first-person perspective: Visual, tactile, and vestibular mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e61751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Revonsuo, A., Tuominen, J., & Valli, K. (2015). The avatars in the machine: Dreaming as a simulation of social reality., Open MIND: Open MIND Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.Google Scholar
  27. Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(7), 319–326.Google Scholar
  28. Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(2), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80–91.Google Scholar
  32. Wegner, D. M. (1997). Why the mind wanders. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Carnegie mellon symposia on cognition: Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 295–315). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Windt, J. M. (2015). Dreaming: A conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect. The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations