Philosophical Studies

, Volume 173, Issue 12, pp 3231–3233

Reply to Eaton and Pickavance

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0

Cite this article as:
Weatherson, B. Philos Stud (2016) 173: 3231. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0

Abstract

David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.

Keywords

Knowledge Interests Gettier cases 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Michigan, Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.ArchéUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations