Reply to Eaton and Pickavance
David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.
KeywordsKnowledge Interests Gettier cases
- Nagel, J. (2014). Knowledge: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar