Priority monism and part/whole dependence
- 336 Downloads
Priority monism is the view that the cosmos is the only independent concrete object. The paper argues that, pace its proponents, Priority monism is in conflict with the dependence of any whole on any of its parts: if the cosmos does not depend on its parts, neither does any smaller composite.
KeywordsPriority monism Dependence Parts/wholes Schaffer, Jonathan
This paper has started out during a stretch of collaborative work with Robert Schwartzkopff. I’d like to thank him for discussing the material at various stages of completion. Thanks are also due to audiences at the Hamburg metaphysics research seminar, and workshops in Essen and Mainz, as well as to three anonymous referees for very helpful comments. Work on this paper was partly funded by the DFG-ANR research project Nominalizations.
- Correia, F. (2005). Existential dependence and cognate notions. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
- Correia, F., & Schnieder, B. (Eds.). (2012). Metaphysical grounding. Understanding the strcuture of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fine, K. (1995). Ontological dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95, 269–290.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, C. (2013). Explanation and fundamentality. In M. Hoeltje, B. Schnieder, & A. Steinberg (Eds.), Varieties of dependence. Ontological dependence, grounding, supervenience, response-dependence. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Künne, W. (1998). Substanzen und Adhärenzen. Zur Ontologie in Bolzanos Athanasia. In A. Newen & U. Meixner (Eds.), Philosophiegeschichte im Überblick (pp. 233–250). Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
- Lowe, E. J. (2010). Ontological dependence. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rosen, G. (2010). Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction. In B. Hale & A. Hoffmann (Eds.), Modality. Metaphysics, logic, and epistemology (pp. 109–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, J. (2009a). On what grounds what. In D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics. New essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 347–383). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Simons, P. (1987). Parts. A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar