Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 172, Issue 7, pp 1723–1736 | Cite as

Perceptual content and the content of mental imagery

  • Bence NanayEmail author
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to argue that the phenomenal similarity between perceiving and visualizing can be explained by the similarity between the structure of the content of these two different mental states. And this puts important constraints on how we should think about perceptual content and the content of mental imagery.

Keywords

Perceptual content Mental imagery Attention Determinacy Determinable/determinate properties Dependency Thesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EU FP7 CIG grant PCIG09-GA-2011-293818 and the FWO Odysseus grant G.0020.12N. I presented this paper at the Fourth Online Consciousness Conference and I am grateful for the comments I received there. I am also grateful for comments by Neil Van Leeuwen, Jake Berger and an anonymous referee for this Journal on an earlier draft.

References

  1. Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The ‘blank screen paradigm’. Cognition, 93, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, K. (1978). A representational theory of action. Philosophical Studies, 34, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bálint, R. (1909/1995). Seelenlahmung des ‘Schauens’, optische Ataxie, raumliche Storung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatsschrift fur Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 25, 51–81. (English translation: Cognitive Neuropsychology 12, 265–281).Google Scholar
  4. Batty, C. (2010). Scents and sensibilia. American Philosophical Quarterly, 47, 103–118.Google Scholar
  5. Bensafi, M., et al. (2003). Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1142–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berryhill, M. E., Phuong, L., Picasso, L., Cabeza, R., & Olson, I. R. (2007). Parietal lobe and episodic memory: Bilateral damage causes impaired free recall of autobiographical memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 14415–14423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Block, N. (1995). A confusion about consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, S. A., & Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briscoe, R. (2011). Mental imagery and the varieties of amodal perception. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burge, T. (2010). The origins of objectivity. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, P., Becker, S., & Burgess, N. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychological Review, 114, 340–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheeny, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. (2000). A theory of sentience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, A. (2004). Sensing, objects, and awareness: Reply to commentators. Philosophical Psychology, 17, 563–589.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, A. (2011). Vicissitudes of non-visual objects. Philosophical Studies, 153, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (2004). Objects, places, and perception. Philosophical Psychology, 17, 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crane, T. (2009). Is perception a propositional attitude? Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie, G. (1995). Visual imagery as the simulation of vision. Mind and Language, 10, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Currie, G., & Ian, R. (2002). Recreative minds: Imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dennett, D. C. (1996). Seeing is believing: Or is it? In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 158–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Findlay, J M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Funkhouser, E. (2006). The determinable–determinate relation. Nous, 40, 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptul systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Gregory, D. (2010). Imagery, the imagination and experience. Philosophical Quarterly, 60, 735–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heckenmueller, E. G. (1965). Stabilization of the retinal image: A review of method, effects and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill, C. (1991). Sensations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hopkins, R. (2012). What Perky did not show. Analysis, 72, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ishiguro, H. (1967). Imagination. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 41, 37–56.Google Scholar
  32. Jacob, P. J., & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Ways of seeing. The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Pictures and spoken descriptions elicit similar eye movements during mental imagery, both in light and in complete darkness. Cognitive Science, 30, 1053–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnston, W. E. (1921). Logic. Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, S. (2010). The normative nature of perceptual experience. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kind, A. (2001). Putting the image back to imagination. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62, 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kleiman, L. (1978). Mental images: Another look. Philosophical Studies, 34, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J., & Alpert, N. M. (1995). Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 378, 496–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kriegel, U. (2007). The phenomenologically manifest. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6,115–136.Google Scholar
  45. Laeng, B., Bloem, I. M., D’Ascenzo, S., & Tommasi, L. (2014). Scrutinizing visual images: The role of gaze in mental imageyr and memory. Cognition, 131, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D.-S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery re-enact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lycan, W. (2000). The slighting of smell. In N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Of minds and molecules: New philosophical perspectives on chemistry (pp. 273–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, M. G. F. (2002). The transparency of experience. Mind and Language, 17, 376–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mast, F. W., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2002). Eye movements during visual mental imagery. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 271–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matthen, M. (2004). Features, places and things. Philosophical Psychology, 17, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Matthen, M. (2010). How things look (and what things look that way). In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Matthews, G. B. (1969). Mental copies. Philosophical Studies, 78, 53–73.Google Scholar
  54. Nanay, B. (2009). Imagining, recognizing and discriminating. Reconsidering the ability hypothesis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79, 699–717.Google Scholar
  55. Nanay, B. (2010a). Attention and perceptual content. Analysis, 70, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nanay, B. (2010b). Perception and imagination: Amodal perception as mental imagery. Philosophical Studies, 150, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nanay, B. (2011a). Do we see apples as edible? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nanay, B. (2011b). Do we sense modalities with our sense modalities? Ratio, 24, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nanay, B. (2011c). Ambiguous figures, attention and perceptual content. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10, 557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nanay, B. (2012a). Action-oriented perception. European Journal of Philosophy, 20, 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nanay, B. (2012b). The philosophical implications of the Perky experiments. Analysis, 72, 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nanay, B. (2012c). Perceiving tropes. Erkenntnis, 77, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nanay, B. (2013). Between perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nanay, B. (2012d). Perceptual phenomenology. Philosophical Perspectives, 26, 235–246.Google Scholar
  65. Neiworth, J. J. (1992). Cognitive aspects of movement estimation: A test of imagery in animals. In K. W. Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 323–346). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  66. Noordhof, P. (2002). Imagining objects and imagining experiences. Mind and Language, 17, 426–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Callaghan, C. (2007). Sounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oakley, D. A. (1985). Cognition and imagery in animals. In D. A. Oakley (Ed.), Brain and Mind (pp. 99–131). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  69. Page, J. W., Duhamel, P., & Crognale, M. A. (2011). ERP evidence of visualization at early stages of visual processing. Brain and Cognition, 75(2), 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peacocke, C. (1985). Imagination, experience, and possibility: A Berkeley-an view defended. In J. Foster & H. Robinson (Eds.), Essays on Berkeley. (pp. 19–35). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  71. Peacocke, C. (1992). A study of concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Perky, C. W. (1910). An experimental study of imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 422–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 2–25.Google Scholar
  75. Posner, M. I. (1984). Current research in the study of selective attention. In E. Donchin (Ed.), Cognitive psychophysiology: Event related potentials and the study of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  76. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.Google Scholar
  77. Prinz, J. (2010). How do perceptual states become conscious? In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the world. New essays on perception. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2007). Things and places: How the mind connects with the world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Richardson, A. (1969). Mental imagery. New York: Springer Publishing Company Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Riddoch, M. J., Edwards, M. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual affordances direct action: Neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 645–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rilling, M. E., & Neiworth, J. J. (1987). Theoretical and methodological considerations for the study of imagery in animals. Learning and Motivation, 18, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Huchinson.Google Scholar
  83. Schellenberg, S. (2013). Belief and desire in imagination and immersion. Journal of Philosophy, 110, 497–517.Google Scholar
  84. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Segal, S. J. (1972). Assimilation of a stimulus in the construction of an image: The Perky effect revisited. In W. P. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 203–230). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  86. Segal, S. J., & Nathan, S. (1964). The Perky effect: Incorporation of an external stimulus into an imagery experience under placebo and control conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shorter, J. M. (1952). Imagination. Mind, 61, 528–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Siegel, S. (2005). The phenomenology of efficacy. Philosophical Topics, 33, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Siegel, S. (2006). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 481–503). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Siegel, S. (2009). The visual experience of causation. Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, J. (2006). Bodily awareness, imagination and the self. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Spivey, M., & Geng, J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stazicker, J. (2011). Attention, visual consciousness and indeterminacy. Mind and Language, 26, 156–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (2003). Chimpanzees understand psychological states—The question is which ones and to what extent. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Trehub, A. (1991). The cognitive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  97. Van Leeuwen, N. (2011). Imagination is where the action is. Journal of Philosophy, 108, 55–77.Google Scholar
  98. Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories. Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 71–94). Cambidge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  99. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Philosophical PsychologyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.PeterhouseUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations