Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 172, Issue 2, pp 283–304 | Cite as

A moral and economic critique of the new property-owning democrats: on behalf of a Rawlsian welfare state

  • Kevin Vallier
Article

Abstract

Property-owning democracies combine the regulative and redistributive functions of the welfare state with the governmental aim of ensuring that wealth and capital are widely dispersed. John Rawls, political philosophy’s most famous property-owning democrat, argued that property-owning democracy was one of two regime types that best realized his two principles of justice, though he was notoriously vague about how a property-owning democracy’s institutions are meant to realize his principles. To compensate for this deficiency, a number of Rawlsian political philosophers have tried to add institutional and policy content to the idea. While their efforts have advanced the discussion, few have criticized the soundness of these attempts. This article attempts to fill the void. I claim that, in comparison to welfare-state capitalism, property-owning democracy is both prohibitively impractical and unjust on Rawlsian grounds. I first argue that property-owning democracy is economically ineffective. Even granting the assumptions of Rawlsian ideal theory, property-owning democracies generate bad incentives and face severe information problems in comparison to more market-friendly welfare states. Further, in nonideal theory the motivations of political officials and citizens will likely be corrupted by the temptation to abuse the awesome state power at their disposal. Second, I argue that property-owning democracy is unjust relative to welfare-state capitalism. The three principles used to defend property-owning democracy—the difference principle, the principle of fair equality of opportunity and the “political liberty” proviso—do not vindicate property-owning democracy and may even prohibit it. Welfare-state capitalism does much better.

Keywords

John Rawls Property-owning democracy Welfare states Economic justice Ideal theory 

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dow, G. (2003). Governing the firm: Workers’ control in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, S. (2013). Property-owning democracy and the difference principle. Analyse & Kritik, 1, 9–36.Google Scholar
  6. Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goodin, R., & Schmidtz, D. (1998). Social welfare and individual responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  9. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Rules and order. Law legislation and liberty (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1979). The political order of a free people. Law, legislation and liberty (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kruse, D., Freeman, R., & Blasi, J. (Eds.). (2011). Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mankiw, G. (2011). Principles of microeconomics. Independence: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  14. Meade, J. (1964). Efficiency, equality and the ownership of property. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Mueller, D. (2003). Public choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Narveson, J. (2013). Comment on Tilo Wesche. Analyse & Kritik, 1, 113–119.Google Scholar
  17. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. O’Neill, M. (2009). Three rawlsian routes towards economic democracy. Revue de Philosophie Economique, 17, 29–55.Google Scholar
  19. O’Neill, M. (2012). Free (and Fair) markets without capitalism: Political values, principles of justice, and property-owning democracy. In M. O’Neill & T. Williamson (Eds.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond (pp. 75–100). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Neill, M., & Williamson, T. (2009). Property-owning democracy and the demands of justice. Living Reviews in Democracy, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  21. O’Neill, M., & Williamson, T. (2012a). Beyond the Welfare State: Rawls’s Radical Vision for a Better America 2013 (March 1st). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. O’Neill, M., & Williamson, T. (2012b). Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Co., Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Roemer, J. (2013). Thoughts on arrangements of property rights in productive assets. Analyse & Kritik, 1, 55–63.Google Scholar
  27. Simmons, A. J. (2010). Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanek, J. (1970). The general theory of labor-managed market economies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ward, B. (1958). The firm in Illyria: Market syndicalism. American Economic Review, 48, 566–589.Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, T. (2009). Who owns what? An egalitarian interpretation of John Rawls’s idea of a property-owning democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 434–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williamson, T. (2013). Constitutionalizing property-owning democracy. Analyse & Kritik, 1, 237–253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations