Philosophical Studies

, Volume 168, Issue 2, pp 545–568

Rationalizing flow: agency in skilled unreflective action

Article

Abstract

In recent work, Peter Railton, Julia Annas, and David Velleman aim to reconcile the phenomenon of “flow”—broadly understood as describing the “unreflective” aspect of skilled action—with one or another familiar conception of agency. While there are important differences between their arguments, Railton, Annas, and Velleman all make, or are committed to, at least one similar pivotal claim. Each argues, directly or indirectly, that agents who perform skilled unreflective actions can, in principle, accurately answer “Anscombean” questions—”what” and “why” questions— about what they do. I argue against this claim and explore the ramifications for theories of skilled action and agency.

Keywords

Agency Skilled action Flow Expertise Nondeliberative action Self-awareness 

References

  1. Abernethy, B. (1981). Mechanisms of skill in cricket batting. Australian Journal of Sports Medicine, 13(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arpaly, N., & Schroeder, T. (2012). Deliberation and acting for reasons. Philosophical Review, 121(2), 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beilock, S. (2010). Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting right when you have to. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beilock, S., & Carr, T. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725.Google Scholar
  7. Beilock, S., & Gray, R. (2012). From attentional control to attentional spillover: A skill-level investigation of attention, kinematic, and performance outcomes. Human Movement Science, 31, 1473–1499.Google Scholar
  8. Beilock, S. L., Wierenga, S. A., & Carr, T. H. (2003). Memory and expertise: What do experienced athletes remember? In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 295–320). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  9. Bengtsson, S., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Ullén, F. (2007). Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 830–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkowitz, A., & Ansari, D. (2008). Generation of novel motor sequences: The neural correlates of musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 41, 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broome, J. (2005). Does rationality give us reasons? Philosophical Issues, 15, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broome, J. (2007). Wide or narrow scope? Mind, 116, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, T., & Carr, T. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 686–700.Google Scholar
  14. Brownstein, M. (2010). Conceptuality and Practical Action: A Critique of Charles Taylor’s Verstehen Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 40(1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012a). Ethical Automaticity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42(1), 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012b). The Normativity of Automaticity. Mind and Language, 27(4), 410–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brownstein, M. (manuscript). Nondeliberative action.Google Scholar
  18. Brownstein, M. (under review). Responsibilit(ies) and implicit bias.Google Scholar
  19. Bruya, B. (Ed.). (2010). Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Christman, J. (2011). The politics of persons: Individual autonomy and socio-historical selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  22. Dietrich, A., & Stroll, O. (2010). Effortless attention, hypofrontality, and perfectionism. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 159–179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dow, J. Manuscript. Just doing what I do: Expert action, reflection, and self-ascription.Google Scholar
  24. Dreyfus, H. (2002a). Intelligence without representation: The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dreyfus, H. (2002b). Refocusing the question: Can there be skillful coping without propositional representations or brain representations? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dreyfus, H. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday experience. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79(2), 43–49.Google Scholar
  27. Dreyfus, H. (2007a). The return of the myth of the mental. Inquiry, 50(4), 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dreyfus, H. (2007b). Response to McDowell. Inquiry, 50(4), 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flegal, K., & Anderson, M. (2008). Overthinking skilled motor performance: Or why those who teach can’t do. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 927–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frankfurt, H. (2002). Reply to Michael E. Bratman. In S. Buss (Ed.), Contours of agency: Essays on themes from Harry Frankfurt, 85–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gabbett, T. & Abernathy, B. (2013). Expert-novice differences in anticipatory skill of rugby league players. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0031221.
  34. Gallagher, S. (2003). Bodily self-awareness and object perception. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 7, 53–68.Google Scholar
  35. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gottlieb, G. (2012). Unreflective action and the argument from speed. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92(3), 338–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hagen, P. (2011). Manuel’s lineups varied and successful. Retrieved September 29 2011 from http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20110929_Manuels_lineups_varied_and_successful.html.
  38. Jacobson, D. (2005). Seeing by feeling: Virtues, skills, and moral perception. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 8, 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell to the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, L. (1988). Motor illusions: What do they reveal about proprioception? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keele, S., & Summers, J. (1976). The structure of motor programs. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (pp. 109–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kirsch, D. 2010. Thinking with the body. The annual meeting of the cognitive science society. http://tecnocogworkshoponcognition.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kirsch-2010-thinking-with-the-body.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2013.
  43. Kolodny, N. (2005). Why be rational? Mind, 114, 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Layden, T. (2010). The art of the pass. Sports Illustrated. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1176714/index.htm. Accessed 13 May 2013.
  45. Levine, L. (1988). Bird: The making of an American sports legend. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2004). Conflict and habit: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the self. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 77–102). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  47. Limb, C., & Braun, A. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3(2), e1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marcel, A. (2003a). The sense of agency: Awareness and ownership of action. In J. Roessler & N. Eilan (Eds.), Agency and self-awareness (pp. 48–93). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Marcel, A. (2003b). Introspective report: Trust, self-knowledge and science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 167–186.Google Scholar
  50. McDowell, J. (2007a). What myth? Inquiry, 50(4), 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McDowell, J. (2007b). Response to Dreyfus. Inquiry, 50(4), 366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two vision systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46, 774–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Milton, J., Solodkin, A., Hluštík, P., & Small, S. (2007). The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage, 35, 804–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Montero, B. (2010). Does bodily awareness interfere with highly skilled movement? Inquiry, 53(2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Shaughnessy, B. (1998). Proprioception in the body image. In J. Bermúdez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 175–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Railton, P. (1997). On the hypothetical and non-hypothetical in reasoning about belief and action. In G. Cullity & B. Gaut (Eds.), Ethics and practical reason (pp. 293–321). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Railton, P. (2009). Practical competence and fluent agency. In D. Sobel & S. Wall (Eds.), Reasons for action (pp. 81–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Railton, P. (2012). Two cheers for virtue, or, might virtue be habit forming? In M. Timmons (Ed.), Oxford studies in normative ethics volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Raz, J. (2005). The myth of instrumental rationality. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  61. Rietveld, E. (2010). McDowell and Dreyfus on unreflective action. Inquiry, 53(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryle, G. (1949/2009). The concept of mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Schear, J. (Ed.). (2013). Mind, reason and being-in-the-world: The McDowell–Dreyfus debate. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Schroeder, M. (2004). The scope of instrumental reason. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwitzgebel, E. (2010). Acting contrary to our professed beliefs, or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shoemaker, D. (2011). Attributability, answerability, and accountability: Towards a wider theory of moral responsibility. Ethics, 121, 602–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free-will, praise, and blame. Mind, 70(279), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stone, C., Barnier, A., Sutton, J., & Hirst, W. (2010). Building consensus about the past: Schema consistency and convergence in socially-shared retrieval induced forgetting. Memory, 18(2), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skill and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 78–103.Google Scholar
  71. Velleman, J. D. (2007). What good is a will? In A. Leist & H. Baumann (Eds.), Action in context. Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
  72. Velleman, J. D. (2008). The way of the wanton. In C. Mackenzie & K. Atkins (Eds.), Practical identity and narrative agency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Velleman, J. D. (2009). How we get along. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wallace, D. F. (2006). Consider the lobster and other essays. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations