The puzzle of the unmarked clock and the new rational reflection principle
- 641 Downloads
The “puzzle of the unmarked clock” derives from a conflict between the following: (1) a plausible principle of epistemic modesty, and (2) “Rational Reflection”, a principle saying how one’s beliefs about what it is rational to believe constrain the rest of one’s beliefs. An independently motivated improvement to Rational Reflection preserves its spirit while resolving the conflict.
KeywordsReflection principle Externalism Christensen Williamson Luminosity Rationality Epistemic modesty Bayesianism Epistemic akrasia
Thanks to David Christensen, Paulina Sliwa, Sophie Horowitz, Maria Lasonen-Aarnio, Michael Titelbaum, Jenann Ismael, participants in the 2011 Brown Epistemology workshop, the Corridor Group, the Princeton Formal Epistemology reading group, and the 2012 Bellingham Summer Philosophy Conference, an audience at Stanford University, and especially Joshua Schechter.
- Christensen, D. (2007). Does Murphy’s law apply in epistemology? Self-doubt and rational ideals. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 2, 3–31.Google Scholar
- Elga, A. (2008, June). Lucky to be rational. Paper presented at Bellingham summer philosophy conference. http://www.princeton.edu/~adame/papers/bellingham-lucky.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2009.
- Horowitz, S., & Sliwa, P. (2011, June). Level-bridging, uncertainty, and akrasia. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1986). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In Philosophical Papers (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ross, J. (2006, October). Acceptance and practical reason. PhD thesis, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2007). Improbable knowing. Notes, 2007. http://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/_data/assets/pdf_file/0014/1319/Orielho.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2011.
- Williamson, T. (2008). Why epistemology cannot be operationalized. In Q. Smith (Ed.), Epistemology, new essays (Chap. 11, pp. 277–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2010). Very improbable knowing. Draft manuscript, 2010. http://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/_data/assets/pdf_file/0015/19302/veryimprobable.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2011.