Philosophical Studies

, Volume 158, Issue 2, pp 343–360 | Cite as

Options and the subjective ought

Article

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dan Greco, Caspar Hare, Richard Holton, Heather Logue, Tyler Paytas, Agustín Rayo, Miriam Schoenfield, Paulina Sliwa, Matthew Noah Smith, Robert Stalnaker, Roger White, and Steve Yablo, as well as audiences at the 2011 MITing of the Minds Conference, the 2011 Bellingham Summer Philosophy, and the 2011 Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress, for very helpful comments.

References

  1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
  3. Chisholm, R. (1963). Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis, 24, 33–36.Google Scholar
  4. Elga, A. (2010). Subjective probabilities should be sharp. Philosopher’s Imprint, 10.Google Scholar
  5. Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hare, C. (2010). Take the sugar. Analysis, 70, 237–247.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson, F., & Robert, P. (1986) . Oughts, options, and actualism. Philosophical Review, 95, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeffrey, R. (1965). The logic of decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffrey, R. (1992). Preference among preferences. In Probability and the art of judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Joyce, J. (1999). The foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joyce, J. (2005). How probabilities reflect evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kavka, G. (1983). The toxin puzzle. Analysis, 43, 33–36.Google Scholar
  13. Levi, I. (1974). On indeterminate probabilities. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollock, J. (2002). Rational choice and action omnipotence. Philosophical Review, 111, 1–23.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, M. N. (2010). Practical imagination and its limits. Philosophers’ Imprint, 10.Google Scholar
  17. von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic logic. Mind, 60, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. White, R. (2009). Evidential symmetry and mushy credence. In Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations