Philosophical Studies

, Volume 166, Issue 1, pp 123–128 | Cite as

Irksome assertions

Article

Abstract

The Knowledge Account of Assertion (KAA) says that knowledge is the norm of assertion: you may assert a proposition only if you know that it’s true. The primary support for KAA is an explanatory inference from a broad range of linguistic data. The more data that KAA well explains, the stronger the case for it, and the more difficult it is for the competition to keep pace. In this paper we critically assess a purported new linguistic datum, which, it has been argued, KAA well explains. We argue that KAA does not well explain it.

Keywords

Assertion Norms Knowledge account Matthew Benton 

References

  1. Bach, K. (2008). Applying pragmatics to epistemology. Philosophical Issues, 18, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, M. (2011). Two more for the knowledge account of assertion. Analysis, 71(4), 684–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaauw, M. (2012). Reinforcing the knowledge account of assertion. Analysis, 72(1), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeRose, K. (2002). Assertion, knowledge, and context. Philosophical Review, 111(2), 167–203.Google Scholar
  5. DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism: Knowledge, skepticism and context (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douven, I. (2006). Assertion, knowledge and rational credibility. Philosophical Review, 115(4), 449–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kvanvig, J. L. (2009). Assertion, knowledge, and lotteries. In D. Pritchard & P. Greenough (Eds.), Williamson on knowledge, pp. 140–160.Google Scholar
  8. Lackey, J. (2007). Norms of assertion. Noûs, 41(4), 594–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McKinnon, R. (2012). How do you know that ‘how do you know?’ Challenges a speaker’s knowledge? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 93, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore, G. E. (1942). A reply to my critics. In P. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of G.E. Moore. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  11. Moore, G. E. (1962). Commonplace book: 1919–1953. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Sorensen, R. (1988). Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stanley, J. (2008). Knowledge and certainty. Philosophical Issues, 18, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Turri, J. (2010). Prompting challenges. Analysis, 70(3), 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Turri, J. (2011). The express knowledge account of assertion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Unger, P. (1975). Ignorance: A case for skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Weiner, M. (2005). Must we know what we say? Philosophical Review, 114(2), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations