Philosophical Studies

, Volume 166, Issue 1, pp 83–107 | Cite as

God knows (but does God believe?)

Article

Abstract

The standard view in epistemology is that propositional knowledge entails belief. Positive arguments are seldom given for this entailment thesis, however; instead, its truth is typically assumed. Against the entailment thesis, Myers-Schulz and Schwitzgebel (Noûs, forthcoming) report that a non-trivial percentage of people think that there can be propositional knowledge without belief. In this paper, we add further fuel to the fire, presenting the results of four new studies. Based on our results, we argue that the entailment thesis does not deserve the default status that it is typically granted. We conclude by considering the alternative account of knowledge that Myers-Schulz and Schwitzgebel propose to explain their results, arguing that it does not explain ours. In its place we offer a different explanation of both sets of findings—the conviction account, according to which belief, but not knowledge, requires mental assent.

Keywords

Knowledge Belief Mental assent Entailment thesis Conviction account Capacity-tendency account 

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1969). Does knowledge entail belief? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 70, 21–36.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D. M. (1973). Belief, truth, and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Black, C. (1971). Knowledge without belief. Analysis, 31, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1966). More about knowing and feeling sure. Analysis, 27, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.Google Scholar
  8. Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (2002). The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In D. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 520–533). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, M. (1992). How to speak of the colors. Philosophical Studies, 68, 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, O. R. (1971). Knowing and guessing: By examples. Analysis, 32, 19–23.Google Scholar
  11. Lehrer, K. (1968). Belief and knowledge. The Philosophical Review, 77, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehrer, K. (1990). Theory of knowledge. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, D. (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 549–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannison, D. S. (1976). “Inexplicable knowledge” does not require belief. Philosophical Quarterly, 26, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Margolis, J. (1973). Knowledge and existence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mellor, D. H. (1978). Conscious belief. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 78, 87–101.Google Scholar
  17. Myers-Schulz, B., & Schwitzgebel, E. Knowing that P without believing that P. Noûs (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Naess, A. (1938). “Truth” as conceived by those who are not professional philosophers. Oslo: I Kommisjon Hos Jacob Dybward.Google Scholar
  19. Pitt, D. (2004). The phenomenology of cognition, or, what is it like to think that P? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Price, H. H. (1969). Belief. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Radford, C. (1966). Knowledge—by examples. Analysis, 27, 1–11.Google Scholar
  22. Rose, D., & J. Schaffer (ms). Knowledge entails dispositional belief. http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/knowbelieve.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
  23. Schope, R. (2002). Conditions and analyses of knowing. In P. Moser (Ed.), The oxford handbook of epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief. Noûs, 36, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorensen, R. (1982). Knowing, believing, and guessing. Analysis, 42, 212–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steup, M. (2001/2006). The Analysis of Knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/ (Fall 2012 Edition).
  27. Sytsma, J. (2010). The proper province of philosophy: Conceptual analysis and empirical investigation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, M. (2001). Problems of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dylan Murray
    • 1
  • Justin Sytsma
    • 2
  • Jonathan Livengood
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and HumanitiesEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations