Philosophical Studies

, Volume 165, Issue 3, pp 975–988

Appetitive besires and the fuss about fit

Article

Abstract

Some motivational cognitivists believe that there are besires—cognitive mental states (typically moral beliefs) that share the key feature of desire (typically desire’s ‘direction of fit’) in virtue of which they are capable of being directly motivational. Besires have been criticized by Humeans and cognitivists alike as philosophically extravagant, incoherent, ad hoc, and incompatible with folk psychology. I provide a response to these standard objections to besires—one motivated independently of common anti-Humean intuitions about the motivational efficacy of moral judgments. I proceed by examining a hypothesis about the nature of appetitive desires—that these paradigmatic motivational attitudes are a mode of perceptual experience—and argue that this hypothesis is committed to the existence of besires. However, despite its commitment to besires, this hypothesis is not extravagant, incoherent, ad hoc, or incompatible with folk psychology. In other words, the standard complaints about besires all fail. The upshot is that there is nothing bizarre about besires, and motivational cognitivism takes on no additional costs by positing them.

Keywords

Appetitive desire Besires Direction of fit Humean theory of motivation Motivational cognitivism 

References

  1. Altham, J. E. J. (1986). The legacy of emotivism. In G. Macdonald & C. Wright (Eds.), Fact, science and morality: Essays on A.J. Ayer’s language, truth and logic (pp. 275–288). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Coleman, M. C. (2008). Directions of fit and the humean theory of motivation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(1), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dancy, J. (1993). Moral reasons. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, W. (1986). The two senses of desire. In J. Marks (Ed.), The ways of desire: New essays in philosophical psychology on the concept of wanting (pp. 63–82). Chicago: Precedent Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fish, W. (2010). Philosophy of perception: A contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbons, J. (2009). You gotta do what you gotta do. Noûs, 43(1), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Humberstone, I. L. (1992). Direction of fit. Mind, 101(401), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hume, D. (1888/1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Little, M. O. (1997). Virtue as knowledge: Objections from the philosophy of mind. Noûs, 31(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory or human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nagel, T. (1978). The possibility of altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Price, H. (1989). Defending desire-as-belief. Mind, 98(389), 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sacks, O. (1998). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  16. Schueler, G. F. (1991). Pro-attitudes and direction of fit. Mind, 100(2), 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schueler, G. F. (1995). Desire: Its role in practical reasoning and the explanation of action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, M. (1987). The humean theory of motivation. Mind, 96(381), 36–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Sobel, D., & Copp, D. (2001). Against direction of fit accounts of belief and desire. Analysis, 61, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stampe, D. W. (1986). Defining desire. In J. Marks (Ed.), The ways of desire: New essays in philosophical psychology on the concept of wanting (pp. 149–173). Chicago: Precedent Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Stampe, D. W. (1987). The authority of desire. The Philosophical Review, 96(3), 335–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stocker, M. (1979). Desiring the bad: An essay in moral psychology. Journal of Philosophy, 76(12), 738–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy/Center for the Teaching and Study of Applied EthicsUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations