Ross on sleeping beauty
- 190 Downloads
In two excellent recent papers, Jacob Ross has argued that the standard arguments for the ‘thirder’ answer to the Sleeping Beauty puzzle lead to violations of countable additivity. The problem is that most arguments for that answer generalise in awkward ways when he looks at the whole class of what he calls Sleeping Beauty problems. In this note I develop a new argument for the thirder answer that doesn't generalise in this way.
KeywordsSleeping beauty Countable additivity Ross
Thanks to Jacob Ross and Sarah Moss for very helpful discussions about how to improve this paper.
- Halpern, J. (2004). Sleeping beauty reconsidered: Conditioning and reflection in asynchronous systems. In Gendler, T. S. & Hawthorne, J. (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 111–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jeshion, R. (2002). Acquaintanceless De Re belief’. In Campbell, J. K., O’Rourke, M. & Shier, D. (Eds.), Meaning and truth: Investigations in philosophical semantics (pp. 53–74). New York, NY: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
- Ross, J. (2011). All roads lead to violations of countable additivity. Philosophical Studies. Published online 24 May 2011.Google Scholar