Philosophical Studies

, Volume 160, Issue 3, pp 415–423 | Cite as

Supervenience and infinitary property-forming operations



This paper provides an account of the closure conditions that apply to sets of subvening and supervening properties, showing that the criterion that determines under which property-forming operations a particular family of properties is closed is applicable both to the finitary and to the infinitary case. In particular, it will be established that, contra Glanzberg, infinitary operations do not give rise to any additional difficulties beyond those that arise in the finitary case.


Supervenience Closure conditions Resplicing Infinitary logic 


  1. Bacon, J. (1986). Supervenience, necessary coextension, and reducibility. Philosophical Studies, 49, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barwise, J. (1973). Back and forth through infinitary logic. In M. Morley (Ed.), Studies in model theory (pp. 5–34). Buffalo, NY: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  3. Currie, G. (1990). Supervenience, essentialism and aesthetic properties. Philosophical Studies, 58, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glanzberg, M. (2001). Supervenience and infinitary logic. Noûs, 35, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karp, C. (1965). Finite-quantifier equivalence. In J. W. Addison, L. Henkin and A. Tarski (Eds.), The Theory of Models (pp. 407–412). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Keisler, H., & Knight, J. (2004). Barwise: infinitary logic and admissible sets. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 10, 4–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, J. (1993). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McLaughlin, B., & Bennett, K. (2005). Supervenience. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  9. Oddie, G., & Tichý, P. (1990). Resplicing properties in the supervenience base. Philosophical Studies, 58, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Cleve, J. (1990). Supervenience and closure. Philosophical Studies, 58, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations