Philosophical Studies

, Volume 159, Issue 1, pp 147–153

What does it take to enter into the circumstance?



  1. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Kölbel, M. (2004). Indexical relativism versus genuine relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 12, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kölbel, M. (2007). How to spell out genuine relativism and how to defend indexical relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 281–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kölbel, M. (2009). The evidence for relativism. Synthese, 166, 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context-dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 643–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In: S. Kanger & S. Öhman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted from Papers in philosophical logic, 1998, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (q.v.).Google Scholar
  7. López de Sa, D. (2003). Response-dependencies: Colors and values. Universitat de Barcelona, PhD Dissertation, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  8. López de Sa, D. (2007). The many relativisms and the question of disagreement. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. López de Sa, D. (2008). Presuppositions of commonality. In: M. García-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (Eds.), Relative truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. López de Sa, D. (2009). Relativizing utterance-truth? Synthese, 170, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. López de Sa, D. (2011). The many relativisms: Index, contex, and beyond. In: S. Hales (Ed.), A companion to relativism (pp. 102–117). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacFarlane, J. (2003). Future contingents and relative truth. Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacFarlane, J. (2005). Making sense of relative truth. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, 105, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacFarlane, J. (2009). Non-indexical contextualism. Synthese, 166, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and practical interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright, C. (1992). Truth and objectivity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICREA at Departament de LògicaHistòria i Filosofia de la Ciència & LOGOS Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations