Philosophical Studies

, Volume 153, Issue 1, pp 29–41 | Cite as

Frictional coherentism? A comment on chapter 10 of Ernest Sosa’s Reflective Knowledge

Article

References

  1. Burge, T. (1993). Content preservation. The Philosophical Review, 102(4), 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burge, T. (2003). Perceptual entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3), 503–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, S. (2002). Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dretske, F. (1970). Epistemic operators. Journal of Philosophy, 67, 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Peacocke, C. (2004). Explaining perceptual entitlement. Chapter 3 of The realm of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Sosa, E. (2004). Relevant alternatives, including contextualism. Philosophical Studies, 119, 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wright, C. (2004). Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free)? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 78, 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wright, C. (2007). The perils of dogmatism. In S. Nuccetelli & G. Seay (Eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New essays in epistemology and ethics (pp. 25–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.The Northern Institute of PhilosophyUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations