Philosophical Studies

, Volume 158, Issue 1, pp 131–148

Implicit definition and the application of logic


DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9675-0

Cite this article as:
Kroedel, T. Philos Stud (2012) 158: 131. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9675-0


The paper argues that the theory of Implicit Definition cannot give an account of knowledge of logical principles. According to this theory, the meanings of certain expressions are determined such that they make certain principles containing them true; this is supposed to explain our knowledge of the principles as derived from our knowledge of what the expressions mean. The paper argues that this explanation succeeds only if Implicit Definition can account for our understanding of the logical constants, and that fully understanding a logical constant in turn requires the ability to apply it correctly in particular cases. It is shown, however, that Implicit Definition cannot account for this ability, even if it draws on introduction rules for the logical constants. In particular, Implicit Definition cannot account for our ability to apply negation in particular cases. Owing to constraints relating to the unique characterisation of logical constants, invoking the notion of rejection does not remedy the situation. Given its failure to explain knowledge of logic, the prospects of Implicit Definition to explain other kinds of a priori knowledge are even worse.


A priori knowledge Knowledge of logic Implicit definition Understanding Negation Rejection 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyHumboldt University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institut für PhilosophieHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations