Philosophical Studies

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 361–382 | Cite as

Resemblance theories of properties

Article

Abstract

The paper aims to develop a resemblance theory of properties that technically improves on past versions. The theory is based on a comparative resemblance predicate. In combination with other resources, it solves the various technical problems besetting resemblance nominalism. The paper’s second main aim is to indicate that previously proposed resemblance theories that solve the technical problems, including the comparative theory, are nominalistically unacceptable and have controversial philosophical commitments.

Keywords

Resemblance nominalism Properties Comparative resemblance predicate Coextension problem Imperfect community problem Companionship problem Mere intersections problem 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, journal referees, and members of the Sheffield Philosophy department, especially Dominic Gregory, for comments.

References

  1. Carnap, R. (1928). Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, transl. by R. George as The Logical Structure of the World (1967), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Eberle, R. (1975). A construction of property classes improved upon the Aufbau. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Rudolf Carnap, logical empiricist (pp. 55–73). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  3. Goldrei, D. (1996). Basic set theory. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, N. (1966). The structure of appearance (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Bob-Merrills.Google Scholar
  5. Hodges, W. (1997). A shorter model theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. James, W. (1890/1910). The principles of psychology (Vol. I). London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71, repr. in Lewis’ Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–55.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Price, H. H. (1953). Thinking and experience. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.Google Scholar
  10. Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rodriguez-Pereyra, R. (2002). Resemblance nominalism: A solution to the problem of universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy (1959 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Williamson, T. (1988). First-order logics for comparative similarity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 29, 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wadham CollegeOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations