Lessons from beyond vision (sounds and audition)
- 303 Downloads
Recent work on non-visual modalities aims to translate, extend, revise, or unify claims about perception beyond vision. This paper presents central lessons drawn from attention to hearing, sounds, and multimodality. It focuses on auditory awareness and its objects, and it advances more general lessons for perceptual theorizing that emerge from thinking about sounds and audition. The paper argues that sounds and audition no better support the privacy of perception’s objects than does vision; that perceptual objects are more diverse than an exclusively visual perspective suggests; and that multimodality is rampant. In doing so, it presents an account according to which audition affords awareness as of not just sounds, but also environmental happenings beyond sounds.
KeywordsNon-visual perception Hearing Sound Objects of perception
Many thanks to Clare Batty, Tim Bayne, Austen Clark, Brian Keeley, Amy Kind, Fiona Macpherson, Mark Okrent, and audience members at the non-visual perception symposium at the 2010 Pacific APA in San Francisco.
- Anscombe, G. E. M. (1965). The intentionality of sensation: A grammatical feature. In R. J. Butler (Ed.), Analytical philosophy (second series). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Armstrong, D. M. (2004). In defense of the cognitivist theory of perception. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 12, 19–26.Google Scholar
- Batty, C. (2010). Scents and sensibilia. American Philosophical Quarterly, 47, 103–118.Google Scholar
- Berkeley, G. (1713/1975). Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. In: M. R. Ayers (Ed.), Philosophical works, including the works on vision. Dent, London.Google Scholar
- Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Casati, R., & Dokic, J. (1994). La Philosopie du Son. Nîmes: Chambon.Google Scholar
- Casati, R., & Dokic, J. (2009). Some varieties of spatial hearing. In M. Nudds & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays (Chap. 5, pp. 97–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (2000). A theory of sentience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (2010). Cross-modal cuing and selective attention. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses: Classical and contemporary philosophical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- de Vignemont, F. (forthcoming). A mosquito bite against the enactive approach to bodily experiences. Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
- Evans, G (1980). Things without the mind—a commentary upon chapter two of Strawson’s Individuals. In Z. van Straaten (Ed.), Philosophical subjects: Essays presented to P. F. Strawson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Fulkerson, M. (forthcoming). The unity of haptic touch. Philosophical Psychology.Google Scholar
- Hellie, B. (2006). Beyond phenomenal naiveté. Philosophers’ Imprint, 6(2), 1–24, http://www.philosophersimprint.org/006002/.
- Jackson, F. (1977). Perception: A representative theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kulvicki, J. (2008). The nature of noise. Philosophers’ Imprint, 8(11), 1–16. http://www.philosophersimprint.org/008011/.
- Lycan, W. (2000). The slighting of smell. In N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Of minds and molecules: New philosophical perspectives on chemistry (pp. 273–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Maclachlan, D. L. C. (1989). Philosophy of perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Malpas, R. M. P. (1965). The location of sound. In R. J. Butler (Ed.), Analytical philosophy (second series, pp. 131–144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Martin, M. (1992). Sight and touch. In T. Crane (Ed.), The contents of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nudds, M., & O’Callaghan, C. (Eds.). (2009). Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Callaghan, C. (2007). Sounds: A philosophical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Shaughnessy, B. (2000). Consciousness and the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Shaughnessy, B. (2009). The location of a perceived sound. In M. Nudds & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays (Chap. 6, pp. 111–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Perkins, M. (1983). Sensing the world. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S. (2008). The contents of perception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/perception-contents/.
- Smith, A. D. (2002). The problem of perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. C. (Ed.). (2007). Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sturgeon, S. (2000). Matters of mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Valberg, J. J. (1992). The puzzle of experience. In T. Crane (Ed.), The contents of experience (pp. 18–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 638–667.Google Scholar