Philosophical Studies

, Volume 157, Issue 2, pp 211–225 | Cite as

Propositional structure and truth conditions

Article

Abstract

This paper presents an account of the manner in which a proposition’s immediate structural features are related to its core truth-conditional features. The leading idea is that for a proposition to have a certain immediate structure is just for certain entities to play certain roles in the correct theory of the brute facts regarding that proposition’s truth conditions. The paper explains how this account addresses certain worries and questions recently raised by Jeffery King and Scott Soames.

Keywords

Proposition Propositional structure Truth conditions Unity of the proposition 

References

  1. Church, A. (1984). Russell’s theory of identity of propositions. Philosophica Naturalis, 24, 513–522.Google Scholar
  2. Deutsch, H. (2008). Review of Jeffery C. King’s The nature and structure of content. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=13165#_edn8.
  3. Frege, G. (1977). Compound thoughts. In P. T. Geach, (Ed.), Logical investigations. Boston: Yale University Press. Originally published in 1923.Google Scholar
  4. King, J. (2007). The nature and structure of content. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. King, J. (2009). Questions of unity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) (Vol. CIX, Part 3, pp. 257–277).Google Scholar
  6. Russell, B. (1996). The principles of mathematics. New York: Norton. Originally published in 1903.Google Scholar
  7. Salmon, N. (1989). Tense and singular propositions. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 331–392). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Soames, S. (2008). The unity of the proposition. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Soames, S. (2010). What is meaning? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Urquhart, A. (2003). The theory of types. In The Cambridge companion to Bertrand Russell (pp. 286–309). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity at Buffalo, SUNYBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations