Philosophical Studies

, Volume 156, Issue 3, pp 433–439 | Cite as

Context, relevant parts and (lack of) disagreement over taste

Article

References

  1. Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2010). Color, context and compositionality. Synthese, 174(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kölbel, M. (2002). Truth without objectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Lahav, R. (1989). Against compositionality: The case of color adjectives. Philosophical Studies, 57(3), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 643–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lasersohn, P. (2008). Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1), 305–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MacFarlane, J. (2007). Relativism and disagreement. Philosophical Studies, 132(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rothschild, D., & Segal, G. (2009). Indexical predicates. Mind and Language, 24(4), 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephenson, T. (2007). Towards a theory of subjective meaning. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
  9. Szabó, Z. (2001). Adjectives in context. In I. Kenesei & R. M. Harnish (Eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer (pp. 119–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations