Philosophical Studies

, Volume 152, Issue 3, pp 447–461 | Cite as

Finding the Mind

Book Symposium on Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension (Oxford University Press, NY, 2008)


  1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Boston, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M., Pook, P., & Rao, R. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723–767.Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: Consensus and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A., & Chalmers, C. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 369(1456), 815–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind (pp. 207–240). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hohwy, J. (2007). Functional integration and the mind. Synthese, 159(3), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  16. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchins, E. (2008). The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 2011–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative Cultural Evolution in the Laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of Optical Society of America, A., 20(7), 1434–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lungarella, M., Pegors, T., Bulwinkle, D., & Sporns, O. (2005). Methods for quantifying the information structure of sensory and motor data. Neuroinformatics, 3(3), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lungarella, M., & Sporns, O. (2005). Information self-structuring: Key principles for learning and development. Proceedings 2005 IEEE Intern. Conf. Development and Learning, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  23. Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Attacking the bounds of cognition. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Milner, A., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Milner, D., & Goodale, M. (2006). Epilogue: Twelve years on. In D. Milner & M. Goodale (Eds.), The visual brain in action (2nd ed., pp. 207–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. Acumen/McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rowlands, M. (2006). Body language: Representing in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sprevak, M. (forthcoming). Inference to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Google Scholar
  31. Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit, and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. In J. McKenna (Ed.), At the boundaries of cricket (Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 763–786). Special issue of Sport in Society, September 2007.Google Scholar
  32. Theiner, G. (ms). The HEC strikes back: Extended cognition and Rupert’s ‘Priority of Cognitive Systems’.Google Scholar
  33. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences–cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhilosophyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations