The things that aren’t actually there
- 184 Downloads
The standard Kripkean semantic theories for quantified modal logic allow the individuals that exist at other worlds to vary from those that exist at the actual world. This causes a problem for those who deny the existence of non-actual individuals. I focus on two prominent strategies for solving this problem, due respectively to Bernard Linsky and Edward Zalta (who identify the possible individuals with the actual individuals) and Alvin Plantinga (who identifies the possible individuals with the individual essences). I argue, contra various commentators, that both of these solutions are acceptable by the lights of those who deny the existence of mere possibilia.
KeywordsActualism Modality Possible worlds Possibilia Plantinga Kripke semantics
Thanks to Elizabeth Barnes, Ross Cameron, John Divers, Joseph Melia, Tatjana von Solodkoff, Jason Turner and Robbie Williams. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Logic Seminar at the University of Cambridge, and I thank my audience on that occasion, and Tim Button in particular, for helpful discussion. Special thanks to to the Analysis Trust for postdoctoral research funding, which supported me financially during my initial work on this paper.
- Divers, J. (2002). Possible worlds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, E. (2004). Comments on Theodore Sider’s four-dimensionalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68, 658–664.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. (1963). Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophical Fennica, 16, 83–94.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Menzel, C. (2008). Actualism. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Online, winter 2008 edition.Google Scholar
- Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. (2004). Précis of four-dimensionalism, and replies to critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68, 642–647, 674–687.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. (2009). Ontological realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar