Philosophical Studies

, 146:399 | Cite as

Ineliminable tension: a reply to Abizadeh and Gilabert’s ‘Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?’

Article
  • 110 Downloads

References

  1. Abizadeh, A., & Gilabert, P. (2008). Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities? Philosophical Studies, 138, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Miller, D. (2005). Reasonable partiality towards compatriots. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 8, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [reprinted with same pagination by Hackett 1988].Google Scholar
  6. Scanlon, T. (2000). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Scheffler, S. (2001). Boundaries and allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social StudiesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations