Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 137, Issue 1, pp 79–89 | Cite as

Contemplative withdrawal in the Hellenistic age

  • Eric Brown
Article

Abstract

I reject the traditional picture of philosophical withdrawal in the Hellenistic Age by showing how both Epicureans and Stoics oppose, in different ways, the Platonic and Aristotelian assumption that contemplative activity is the greatest good for a human being. Chrysippus the Stoic agrees with Plato and Aristotle that the greatest good for a human being is virtuous activity, but he denies that contemplation exercises virtue. Epicurus more thoroughly rejects the assumption that the greatest good for a human being is virtuous activity. He maintains that the greatest good for a human being is the tranquility that virtuous activity always and contemplative activity sometimes brings about.

Keywords

Stoicism Epicureanism Chrysippus Epicurus Contemplation Happiness Virtue 

References

  1. Armstrong, A. H. (1957). An introduction to ancient philosophy. Westminster, Maryland: The Newman Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bevan, E. (1913). Stoics and Sceptics. Oxford: Clarendon (reprinted Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons, 1959).Google Scholar
  3. Brown, E. (2000). Justice and compulsion for Plato’s philosopher-rulers. Ancient Philosophy, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, E. (2002). Epicurus on the value of friendship (Sententia Vaticana 23). Classical Philology, 97, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, E. (2004). Minding the gap in Plato’s republic. Philosophical Studies, 117, 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, E. (2005a). Plato on the rule of wisdom. In T. Roche (Ed.), Spindel Conference 2004: Ancient Ethics and Politics (Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 s.v. [2005]), pp. 84–96.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, E. (2005b). Wishing for fortune, choosing activity: Aristotle on external goods and happiness. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 21, 57–81. To be fully reprinted in volume 22 (2006) because the editors went to press without circulating proofs and neglected to print the article’s notes.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, E. (2006). Hellenistic cosmopolitanism. In M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin (Eds.), A companion to ancient philosophy (pp. 549–558). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, E. (forthcoming a) Aristotle on the choice of lives: Two concepts of self-sufficiency. In P. Destrée (Ed.), Quel choix de vie? Études sur les rapports entre theôria et praxis chez Aristote. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, E. (forthcoming b) Politics and society. In J. Warren (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, E. (forthcoming c) Stoic cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Erskine, A. (1990). The Hellenistic Stoa: Political thought and action. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Habicht, C. (1997). Athens from Alexander to Antony (trans. Deborah Lucas Schneider). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hegel, G. W. F. (1892–1896). Lectures on the history of philosophy (trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson from the second edition of 1840–1844), 3 vols. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. (reprinted Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995, first German edition 1833–1836).Google Scholar
  15. Joly, R. (1956). Le Thème Philosophique des Genres de Vie dans l’Antiquité Classique. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale de Belgique, 51(3), 7–201.Google Scholar
  16. Long, A. A. (1986). Hellenistic philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (2nd ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. MacIntyre, A. (1966). A short history of ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Mewaldt, J. (1926). Das Weltbürgertum in der Antike. Die Antike, 2, 177–189.Google Scholar
  20. Momigliano, A. (1941). Review of B. Farrington, science and politics in the ancient world. Journal of Roman Studies, 31, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Keefe, T. (2002). The cyrenaics on pleasure, happiness, and future-concern. Phronesis, 47, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sedley, D. (1997). The ethics of Brutus and Cassius. Journal of Roman Studies, 87, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sinclair, T. A. (1952). A history of Greek political thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  24. Warren, J. (2002). Epicurus and Democritean ethics: An archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Zeller, E. (1870). The Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics (trans. O. J. Reichel, from Die Philosophie der Griechen, 2nd ed.). London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Zeller, E. (1931). Outlines of the history of Greek philosophy (13th ed., revised by Wilhelm Nestle. trans. L.R. Palmer). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (reprinted New York: Dover, 1980. Grundriss der Geschichte der Griechischen Philosophie first published, 1883).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWashington University in St. LouisSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations