Philosophical Studies

, Volume 135, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Narrative closure

Article

Abstract

In this article, “Narrative Closure,” a theory of the nature of narrative closure is developed. Narrative closure is identified as the phenomenological feeling of finality that is generated when all the questions saliently posed by the narrative are answered. The article also includes a discussion of the intelligibility of attributing questions to narratives as well as a discussion of the mechanisms that achieve this. The article concludes by addressing certain recent criticisms of the view of narrative expounded by this article.

Keywords

Narrative closure Erotetic narrative Closure Questions Answers Aristotle Hume 

References

  1. Aristotle. (1996). Poetics (M. Heath, Trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, N. (1996). Toward a theory of film suspense. In Theorizing the moving image. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, N. (2001). On the narrative connection. In Beyond aesthetics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Collingwood R. G. (1940). An essay in metaphysics. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Edgar Allen Poe. (xxxx). Mystery. In New Short StoryTheories.Google Scholar
  7. Feagin, S. (1996). Reading with feeling: The aesthetics of appreciation (pp. 52–53). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Forster, E.M. (1927). Aspects of the novel. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Hernstein-Smith, B. (1968). Poetic closure: A study of how poems end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hiz, H. (1962). Questions and answers. The Journal of Philosophy, 59(10), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hume, D. (1993). Of tragedy. In S. Copley & A. Edgar (Eds.), Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kermode, F. (1966). The Sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. In Philosophical Papers (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lohafer S. (1994). A cognitive approach to storyness. In C. May (Ed.), The new short story theories. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mackie J. L. (1976) Causes and conditions. In M. Brand (Ed.), The nature of causation. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mink, L. (1987). History and fiction as modes of comprehension. In B. Fay, E. Golob, & R. Vann (Eds.), Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Somerville, J. (2002). The epistemological significance of the interrogative. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publisher Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Velleman, J. D. (2003). Narrative explanation. The Philosophical Review, 112(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Welty, E. (1949). The reading and writing of short stories. In The Atlantic Monthly, (pp. 54–58).Google Scholar
  21. Wiśniewski, A. (1995). The posing of questions: logical foundations of erotetic inferences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the HumanitiesTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations