Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 141–164 | Cite as

The Content–Force Distinction

  • Peter W. Hanks
Article

Keywords

Propositional Attitude Propositional Content Representational Content Embed Clause Attitude Verb 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown D.G. (1970): ’Knowing How and Knowing That, What’. In: Wood O.P., Pitcher G. (eds). Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York, Doubleday, pp. 213–248Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky N. (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, ForisGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies M. (1981): Meaning, Quantification, Necessity. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Dummett M. (1973): Frege: Philosophy of Language. Cambridge MA, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  5. Frege, G. (1879): ’Begriffschrift’, in P.Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 1–20), New York: Philosophical Library, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. Frege, G. (1892a): ’On Sense and Reference’, in P.Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78), New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  7. Frege, G. (1892b): ’On Concept and Object’, in P.Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 42–55), New York: Philosophical Library, 1952.Google Scholar
  8. Frege, G. (1918–1919a): ’Thoughts’, in B. McGuinness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy (pp. 351–372), Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. Frege, G. (1918–19b): ’Negation’, in B. McGuinness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy (pp. 373–389), Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Frege, G. (1979). in H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach (eds.), Posthumous Writings (pp. 251–252), Chicago: University of Chicago. Geach, P.T. (1960): ’Ascriptivism’, Philosophical Review 69, 221–225.Google Scholar
  11. Geach P.T. (1965): ’Assertion’. Philosophical Review 74: 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1982): ’Semantic Analysis of WH-Complements’. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 175–233Google Scholar
  13. Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1997): ’Questions’, in J. van Bentham and A.ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language (pp. 1055–1124). Cambridge, MA :MIT.Google Scholar
  14. Hamblin C.L. (1973): ’Questions in Montague English’. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53Google Scholar
  15. Higginbotham, J. (1993): ’Interrogatives’, in K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 195–227), Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Higginbotham, J. (1996): ’The Semantics of Questions’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 361–384), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Hintikka, J. (1976): The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics, Acta Philosophica Fennica 28.4, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Karttunen L. (1977): ’Syntax and Semantics of Questions’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King J. (1995): ’Structured Propositions and Complex Predicates’. Noûs 29:516–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDowell, J. (1976): ’Truth Conditions, Bivalence and Verificationism’, in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.) Truth and Meaning (pp. 42–66), Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, T. (1993): ’On Denoting Propositions and Facts’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 7 Logic and Language (pp. 441–460), Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
  22. Prior, A.N. (1971): in P.T. Geach and A.J. Kenny (eds.), Objects of Thought, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  23. Russell B. (1903): Principles of Mathematics. New York, W.W. NortonGoogle Scholar
  24. Russell B. (1904): ’Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions (III)’. Mind 13: 509–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell, B. (1910): ’On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood’, in Philosophical Essays (pp. 147–159), New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Searle J. (1969): Speech Acts. Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Searle J. (1979): Expression and Meaning. Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Searle, J. (1962): ’Meaning and Speech Acts’, in C.D. Rollins (ed.), (pp. 28– 37), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  29. Soames, S. (1987): ’Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’, Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87. Reprinted in N.Salmon and S. Soames (eds.), Propositions and Attitudes (pp. 197–239). Oxford: Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
  30. Stanley J. Williamson T. (2001): ’Knowing How’. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strawson, P.F. (1974): ’Positions for Quantifiers’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy (pp. 63–79), New York: NYU.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Minnesota-Twin citiesMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations