It is widely believed that shapes are intrinsic properties. But this claim is hard to defend. I survey all known theories of shape properties, and argue that each theory is either incompatible with the claim that shapes are intrinsic, or can be shown to be false.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Nominalism and realism: universals and scientific realism, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bricker, P. (1993). The fabric of space: Intrinsic vs. extrinsic distance relations. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 43, 271–293.Google Scholar
- Earman, J. (1989). World enough and space-time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Field, H. (1989). Can we dispense with space-time? In Realism, mathematics, and modality, Chapter 6. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Leibniz, G. W., & Clarke S. (2000). Correspondence. Ed. Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Parsons, J. (forthcoming). “Theories of location.” In: Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics (Vol. 3). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Royden, H. L. (1959). Remarks on primitive notions for elementary euclidean and non-euclidean plane geometry. In L. Henkin (Eds), The axiomatic method with special reference to geometry and physics (pp. 86–96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. (2004) Replies to critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68(3), 674–687.Google Scholar
- Sklar, L. (1974). Space, time, and spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Tarski, A. (1959). What is elementary geometry?. In: L. Henkin (Ed), The axiomatic method with special reference to geometry and physics (pp. 16–29). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar