Philosophical Studies

, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Formulating the Thesis of Physicalism: An Introduction

Article

Keywords

Actual World Philosophical Study Ideal Physic Future Physic Current Physic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, R. 1980‘Materialism Without Reduction: What Physicalism Does Not Entail’Ned, B. eds. Readings in Philosophy and PsychologyMethuenLondon268305Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D. 2004‘Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics’Philosophical Studies118153226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalmers, D, Jackson, F. 2001‘Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation’Philosophical Review110315360Google Scholar
  4. Crook, S., Gillet, C. 2001‘Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the “Physical”: Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism’Canadian Journal of Philosophy31333360Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D. 1970‘Mental Events’Foster, L.Swanson, J.W. eds. Experience and TheoryUniversity of Massachusetts PressAmherstGoogle Scholar
  6. Dowell, J. (this volume): “The Physical: Emperical, not Metaphysical”, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  7. Dowell, J. (manuscript): “Serious Metaphysics and the Vindication of Reductions.” http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/phil/faculty/dowell/dowell.html
  8. Hellman, G. 1985‘Determination and Logical Truth’Journal of Philosophy82607616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hempel, C. 1969‘Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets’Morgenbesser,  S.Suppes, P.White, M. eds. Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest NagelSt. Martin’s PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hempel, C. (1980): ‘Comments on Goodman’s Ways of Worldmaking’, Synthese XLV, 193–199Google Scholar
  11. Hill, C. 1991Sensations: A Defense of Type MaterialismCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Horgan, T. 1986a‘Psychologism, Semantics, and Ontology’Nous202131Google Scholar
  13. Horgan, T. 1986b‘Truth and Ontology’Philosophical Papers15121Google Scholar
  14. Horgan, T. 1991‘Metaphysical Realism and Psychologistic Semantics’Erkenntnis34297322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horgan, T. 1993‘The Austere Ideology of Folk Psychology’Mind and Language8282297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horgan, T. 2001‘Contextual Semantics and Metaphysical Realism: Truth as Indirect Correspondence’Lynch, M. eds. The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary PerspectivesMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Horgan, T. (this volume): ‘Materialism: Matters of Definition, Defense, and Deconstruction’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  18. Horgan, T., Tienson, J. 2001‘Deconstructing New Wave Materialism’Gillet, C.Loewer, B. eds. Physicalism and Its DiscontentsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, F. 1998From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual AnalysisClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, F. 2005‘The Case for A priori Physicalism’Nimtz, C.Beckermann, A. eds. Philosophy-Science-Scientific Philosophy, Main Lectures and Colloquia of GAP 5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, 2003MentisPaderborn251265Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, F. (this volume): ‘On Ensuring that Physicalism is not a Dual Attribute Theory in, Sheep’s Clothing’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  22. LePore, E., Loewer, B. 1989‘More on Making Mind Matter’Philosophical Topics17175191Google Scholar
  23. McLaughlin, B. 2001‘In Defense of New Wave Materialism: A Response to Horgan and Tienson’Gillet, C.Loewer, B. eds. Physicalism and Its DiscontentsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McLaughlin, B. 2005‘A Priori versus A Posteriori Physicalism’Nimtz,  C.Beckermann, A. eds. Philosophy-Science-Scientific Philosophy, Main Lectures and Colloquia of GAP 5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, 2003MentisPaderborn267285Google Scholar
  25. Melnyk, A. 1997‘How to Keep the “Physical” in Physicalism’Journal of Philosophy94622637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melnyk, A. 2003A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern MaterialismCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Melnyk, M. (this volume): ‘Realization and the Formulation of Physicalism’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  28. Montero, B. 1999‘The Body Problem’Nous33183200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montero, B. 2001‘Post-Physicalism’Journal of Consciousness Studies86180Google Scholar
  30. Smart, J.J.C. 1959‘Sensations and Brain Processes’Philosophical Review68141156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stalnaker, R. (2003): ‘On Considering a World as Actual’, in Ways a World Might Be, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoljar, D. (2001): ‘Physicalism’, Stanford On-line Encyclopedia of Philosophy Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, J. 2005‘Supervenience-based Formulations of Physicalism’Nous29426459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, J. (this volume): ‘On Characterizing the Physical’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  35. Witmer, G. (this volume): ‘How to Be a (sort of) A priori Physicalist’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar
  36. Worley, S. (this volume): ‘Physicalism and the Via Negativa’, Philosophical Studies Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations