Philosophical Studies

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 243–267 | Cite as

Bonjour’s Arguments against Skepticism about the A Priori

  • James R. BeebeEmail author


I reconstruct and critique two arguments Laurence BonJour has recently offered against skepticism about the a priori. While the arguments may provide anti-skeptical, internalist foundationalists with reason to accept the a priori, I show that neither argument provides sufficient reason for believing the more general conclusion that there is no rational alternative to accepting the a priori.


Perceptual Experience Direct Experience Inductive Inference Rational Alternative Perceptual Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antony L. (2004). A Naturalized Approach to the A Priori. Philosophical Issues 14: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe, J. (forthcoming (a)): `Bonjour on SkepticismGoogle Scholar
  3. Beebe, J. (forthcoming (b)): `Bonjour's Rationalist Solution to the Problem of InductionGoogle Scholar
  4. BonJour L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. BonJour L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. BonJour L. (1999). Foundationalism and the External World. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 229–249Google Scholar
  7. BonJour L. (2001). Toward a Defense of Empirical Foundationalism. In: DePaul, Michael R. (eds) Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism, pp 21–38. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  8. BonJour, L. (2003): ‘A Version of Internalist Foundationalism’, in BonJour and Sosa, pp. 3–96Google Scholar
  9. BonJour L. and Ernest S. (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll L. (1895/1995). What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Mind 104: 691–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casullo A. (2000). The Coherence of Empiricism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81: 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casullo A. (2003). A Priori Justification. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldman A. (1999). A Priori Warrant and Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 1–28Google Scholar
  14. Miscevic N. (1998). The Rationalist and the Tortoise. Philosophical Studies 92: 175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smiley T. (1995). A Tale of Two Tortoises. Mind 104: 725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations