Philosophical Studies

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 59–85 | Cite as

The Phenomenal Stance

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of MindMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. 1997

    ‘Are Children with Autism Superior at Folk Physics?’

    Wellman, H.Inagaki, K. eds. The Emergence of Core Domains of Thought: Children’s Reasoning about Physical, Psychological, and Biological PhenomenaJossey-BassSan Francisco4554
    Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. 2000a

    ‘Autism: Deficits in Folk Psychology Exist Alongside Superiority in Folk Physics’

    Baron-Cohen, S.Tager-Flusberg, H.Cohen, D.J. eds. Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience2Oxford University PressOxford7382
    Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. 2000b

    ‘Theory of Mind and Autism: A Fifteen Year Review’

    Baron-Cohen, S.Tager-Flusberg, H.Cohen, D.J. eds. Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience2Oxford University PressOxford320
    Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. 2002The Extreme Male Brain Theory of AutismTrends in Cognitive Sciences6249254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. 2003The Essential Difference: Male and Female Brains and the Truth about AutismBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Robertson, M. 1997‘Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Evidence from Very High Functioning Adults with Autism or Asperger Syndrome’Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry38813822Google Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., Frith, U. 1986‘Mechanical, Behavioural and Intentional Understanding of Picture Stories in Autistic Children’British Journal of Developmental Psychology4113125Google Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stone, V. 1999‘A Mathematician, a Physicist, and a Computer Scientist with Asperger Syndrome: Performance on Folk Psychology and Folk Physics Tests’Neurocase5475483Google Scholar
  10. Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., St. George, M. 2000‘The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses’Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience12 729Google Scholar
  11. Bentham, J. 1789An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and LegislationOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Blair, R.J.R. 1995‘A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath’Cognition57129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blair, R.J.R. 1996‘Brief Report: Morality in the Autistic Child’Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders26571579Google Scholar
  14. Blair, R.J.R. 1999‘Psychophysiological Responsiveness to the Distress of Others in Children in Autism’Personality and Individual Differences26477485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blair, R.J.R., Sellars, C., Strickland, I., Clark, F., Williams, A., Smith, M., Jones, L. 1996‘Theory of Mind in the Psychopath’Journal of Forensic Psychiatry71525Google Scholar
  16. Bloom, P. 2004Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us HumanBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Boyer, P., Barrett, H.C. 2005

    ‘Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology’

    Buss, D. eds. Handbook of Evolutionary PsychologyWileyHoboken96118
    Google Scholar
  18. Chalmers, D. 1996The Conscious MindOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Churchland, P. S. 1996‘The Hornswoggle Problem’Journal of Consciousness Studies3402408Google Scholar
  20. Damasio, A. 1994Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human BrainPutnamNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dennett, D. (1981a): ‘Intentional Systems’, in Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (pp. 3--22), Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dennett, D. (1981b): ‘Mechanism and Responsibility’, in Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (pp. 233--255), Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dennett, D. (1987): ‘True Believers: The Intentional Strategy and Why It Works’,The Intentional Stance(pp. 13--36), Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dennett, D. 1991Consciousness ExplainedLittle, BrownNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Dolan, D. 2002‘Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior’Science29811911194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher, H. 2004Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic LoveHoltNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Frith, U. 2003Autism: Explaining the Enigma2BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallagher, H., Jack, A.I., Roepstorff, A., Frith, C. 2002‘Imaging the Intentional Stance’NeuroImage16814821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gergeley, G., Csibra, C. 2003‘Teleological Reasoning in Infancy: The Naïve Theory of Rational Action’Trends in Cognitive Sciences7287292Google Scholar
  30. Greene, J., Haidt, J. 2002‘How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?’Trends in Cognitive Sciences6517523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Happé, F. 1994‘An Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Understanding of Story Characters’ Thoughts and Feelings by Able Autistic, Mentally Handicapped, and Normal Children and Adults’Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders24129154Google Scholar
  32. Hare, R. 1991The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – RevisedMulti-Health SystemsTorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Hare, R. 1993Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among UsGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Hegarty, M. 2004‘Mechanical Reasoning by Mental Simulation’Trends in Cognitive Sciences8280285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jack, A.I., Robbins, P. 2004‘The Illusory Triumph of Machine over Mind: Wegner’s Eliminativism and the Real Promise of Psychology’Behavioral and Brain Sciences27665666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jack, A.I., Roepstorff, A. 2002‘Introspection and Cognitive Brain-mapping: From Stimulus-response to Script-report’Trends in Cognitive Sciences6333339Google Scholar
  37. Jack, A.I., Shallice, T. 2001‘Introspective Physicalism as an Approach to the Science of Consciousness’Cognition79161196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., Wynn, K. 2004‘Do 5-Month-old Infants See Humans as Material Objects?’Cognition9495103Google Scholar
  39. Ledoux, J. 1998The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional LifeSimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Leslie, A.M. 1994

    ‘ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core Architecture and Domain Specificity’

    Hirschfeld, L.Gelman, S. eds. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and CultureCambridge University PressCambridge119148
    Google Scholar
  41. Leslie, A.M., Thaiss, L. 1992‘Domain Specificity in Conceptual Development: Neuropsychological Evidence from Autism’Cognition43225251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine, J. 1983‘Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap’Pacific Philosophical Quarterly64354361Google Scholar
  43. Martin, A., Weisberg, J. 2003‘Neural Foundations for Understanding Social and Mechanical Concepts’Cognitive Neuropsychology20575587Google Scholar
  44. Michotte, A. 1963The Perception of CausalityMethuenLondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Moll, J., Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P.J. 2003‘Morals and the Human Brain: A Working Model’NeuroReport14299305Google Scholar
  46. Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P.J., Bramati, I.E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P.A., Pessoa, L. 2002‘The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions’Journal of Neuroscience2227302736Google Scholar
  47. Moll, J., Eslinger, P.J., Oliveira-Souza, R. 2001‘Frontopolar and Anterior Temporal Cortex Activation in a Moral Judgment Task’Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria59657664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagel, T. 1974‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat?’Philosophical Review82435450Google Scholar
  49. Premack, D., Woodruff, G. 1978’Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?’Behavioral and Brain Sciences4515526Google Scholar
  50. Preston, S.D., de Waal, F.B.M. 2002‘Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases’Behavioral and Brain Sciences25120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richell, R.A., Mitchell, D.G.V., Newman, C., Leonard, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Blair, R.J.R. 2003‘Theory of Mind and Psychopathy: Can Psychopathic Individuals Read the “Language of The Eyes”?’Neuropsychologica41523526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salmon, N. 1986Frege’s PuzzleMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, P. 1976

    ‘All Animals Are Equal’

    Regan, T.Singer, P. eds. Animal Rights and Human ObligationsPrentice-HallNew York148162
    Google Scholar
  54. Singer, T., Wolpert, D., Frith, C. 2003

    ‘Introduction: The Study of Social Interactions’

    Frith, C.Wolpert, D. eds. The Neuroscience of Social Interaction: Decoding, Imitating, and Influencing the Actions of OthersOxford University PressOxfordxiiixxvii
    Google Scholar
  55. Spelke, E.S. 1988

    ‘The Origins of Physical Knowledge’

    Weiskrantz, L. eds. Thought Without LanguageOxford University PressOxford168184
    Google Scholar
  56. Spelke, E.S., Phillips, A., Woodward, A.L. 1995

    ‘Infants’ Knowledge of Object Motion and Human Action’

    Sperber, D.Premack, D.Premack, A.J. eds. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary DebateOxford University PressOxford4478
    Google Scholar
  57. Turiel, E. 1983The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and ConventionCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Tye, M. 1999‘Phenomenal Consciousness: The Explanatory Gap as a Cognitive Illusion’Mind108705725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wall, P.D. 2002Pain: The Science of SufferingColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfe, T. (2000): ‘Sorry, but Your Soul Just Died’, in Hooking Up (pp. 89--109), New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWashington University in St. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyWashington University in St. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations