Philosophical Studies

, Volume 134, Issue 3, pp 363–403 | Cite as

Events, Tropes, and Truthmaking

Article

Abstract

Nominalizations are expressions that are particularly challenging philosophically in that they help form singular terms that seem to refer to abstract or derived objects often considered controversial. The three standard views about the semantics of nominalizations are [1] that they map mere meanings onto objects, [2] that they refer to implicit arguments, and [3] that they introduce new objects, in virtue of their compositional semantics. In the second case, nominalizations do not add anything new but pick up objects that would be present anyway in the semantic structure of a corresponding sentence without a nominalization. In the first and third case, nominalizations in a sense ‘create’ new objects’, enriching the ontology on the basis of the meaning of expressions. I will argue that there is a fourth kind of nominalization which requires a quite different treatment. These are nominalizations that introduce ‘new’ objects, but only partially characterize them. Such nominalizations generally refer to events or tropes. I will explore an account according on which such nominalizations refer to truth makers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong D. (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge, UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong D. (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong D. (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Asher N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Asher N. (2000). `Events, Facts, Propositions and Evolutive Anaphora'. In: (eds) Speaking of Events, pp. Oxford UP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bacon J. (1995). Universals and Property Instances – The Alphabet of Being. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett J. (1988). Events and their Names. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bigelow J.C. (1988). The Reality of Numbers. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell K. (1990). Abstract Particulars. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnap R. (1956). Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology. In: (eds) Meaning and Necessity, pp 205–221. Chicago UP, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Chisholm R. (1970). `Events and Propositions'. Nous 4: 15–24Google Scholar
  12. Chierchia, G. (1984): Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitivals and Gerunds. Ph D dissertation University of Massachusetts AmherstGoogle Scholar
  13. Cresswell M. (1985). Adverbial Modification. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson D. (1987). `The Logical form of Action Sentences'. In: Davidson, D. and Rescher, N. (eds) The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 81–95, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson D. (1969). `The Individuation of Events'. In: Rescher, N. (eds) Essays in Honour of Carl Hempel, pp. Reidel pp. 216–234, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Dummett M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox J. (1987). `Truthmaker'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 188–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frege, G. (1884): Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung uber den Begriff der Zahl. Translated by J. L. Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic. Blackwell, 1950Google Scholar
  19. Frege G. (1892). `Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand'. Vierteljahreszeitschrift fuer wissenschaftliche Philosophie XVI: 192–205Google Scholar
  20. Hale B. (1987). Abstract Objects. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Higginbotham J. (1985). `On Semantics'. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–597 Google Scholar
  22. Higginbotham, J. (2000): ‘On Events in Linguistic Semantics’, in Higginbotham et al. (2000)Google Scholar
  23. Higginbotham J. (2000). Speaking of Events. Oxford UP, Oxford, 49–79Google Scholar
  24. Kim J. (1976). `Events as Property Exemplifications'. In: Brand, M. and Walton, D. (eds) Action Theory, Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Landman F (2000). Events and Plurality. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Levinson J. (1980). `The Particularization of Attributes'. Australiasian Journal of Philosophy 58: 102–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, D. (1983): ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4), 343–377. Reprinted in Mellor/Oliver (eds.), 188–227Google Scholar
  28. Lewis D. (2001). `Truthmaking and Difference-Making'. Nous 35: 602–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lombard L.B. (1986). Events. A Metaphysical Study. Routledge/Kegan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Loux, M. (1974): Ookham's Summa Logicae. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notle Dame PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Loux, M. (1998): Metaphysics. A contemporary Introduction, London/New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowe E.J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics. Substance, Identity and Time. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurin A.-S. (2002). If Tropes. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  34. Montague, R. (1960): ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, Monist 53, 159–194, reprinted in R. Montague: Formal Philosophy, Yale UP, New Haven, 1974Google Scholar
  35. Moltmann F. (1997). Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford UP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Moltmann F. (2003). `Propositional Attitudes without Propositions'. Synthese 135: 77–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moltmann F. (2004). Properties and Kinds of Tropes: New Linguistic Facts and Old Philosophical Insights'. Mind 113: 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mulligan K., Simons P. and Smith B. (1984). `Truthmakers'. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 287–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nuchelmans, G. (1973): Theories of Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam and London: North HollandGoogle Scholar
  40. Parsons T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.)Google Scholar
  41. Peterson P. (1997). Fact, Proposition, Event. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Reichenbach H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  43. Read S. (2000). `Truthmakers and the Disjunction Thesis'. Mind 109: 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Restall G. (1996). `Truthmakers, Entailment and Necessity'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodriguez-Pereyra G. (2000). `What is the Problem of Universals'. Mind 109: 255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (to appear): ‘Why Truthmakers’, in J. Dodd et al. (eds.), Truthmakers, Oxford: Oxford UPGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell, B. (1918/1919): ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, The Monist 28(1918), 495–527, 29(1919), 190–222, 345–380Google Scholar
  48. Sanford, D.H. (2002): ‘Determinates and Determinables’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, onlineGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharvy R. (1980). `A More General Theory of Descriptions'. Philosophical Review 89: 607–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simons P. (1987). Parts. A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Simons, P. (1994): ‘Particulars in Particular Clothing. Three Trope Theories of Substance’, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54.3, pp. 553–574. Reprinted in S. Laurence/C. MacDonald (eds.): Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998Google Scholar
  52. Steward H (1997). The Ontology of Mind. Oxford UP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor B. (1985). Modes of Occurrences. Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams, D.C. (1953): `On the Elements of Being’, Review of Metaphysics 7, 3–18. Reprinted in Mellor/Oliver (eds.), 112–124Google Scholar
  55. Woltersdorff, N. (1960): ‘Qualities’, Philosophical Review 69. Reprinted in: Schoedinger, A., (ed.), The Problem of Universals, New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1992Google Scholar
  56. Woltersdoff, N. (1970): On Universals. An Essay in Ontology, Chicago: Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright C. (1983). Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects. Aberdeen UP, AberdeenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations