Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 259–279 | Cite as

Immaterial engagement: human agency and the cognitive ecology of the internet

  • Robert W. ClowesEmail author
Article

Abstract

While 4E cognitive science is fundamentally committed to recognising the importance of the environment in making sense of cognition, its interest in the role of artefacts seems to be one of its least developed dimensions. Yet the role of artefacts in human cognition and agency is central to the sorts of beings we are. Internet technology is influencing and being incorporated into a wide variety of our cognitive processes. Yet the dominant way of viewing these changes sees technology as an outside force “impacting” on our minds. Within this context, Material Engagement Theory (MET) seems well poised to help make sense of our cognitive involvement with the Internet as MET is precisely concerned with grasping the role of material culture in human cognition. This paper explores some of the resources MET provides to think through the effects the internet is having on human agency. This paper uses MET as a starting point for examining the way Internet technology can be involved with human agency, both to the provide a much needed and more adequate theorization of these phenomena, but also to illustrate ways in which the consideration of artefacts can be given a more central and adequate place within the 4E cognitive sciences.

Keywords

Agency Cognitive technology Cloud technology Material engagement Artefactual turn Strong agency Planning Reflection Internet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Shaun Gallagher and Lambros Malafouris who invited me to first present this work at Keble College workshop on Creative Evolution: Mind, biosocial plasticity and material engagement. Thanks again Lambros for his patient and engaged approach to editing. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers, to Marek McGann and the ENSO seminar series, and the Lisbon Mind and Reasoning Group, where I presented several versions of this paper. This work is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under grant number SFRH/BPD/70440/2010 on “Virtualism and the Mind: Rethinking Presence, Representation and Self” and by an FCT strategic project grant for IFILNOVA, FCSH/NOVA UID/FIL/00183/2013.

References

  1. Alzahabi, R., & Becker, M. W. (2013). The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1485.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to Man's understanding of himself. New York: Balantine.Google Scholar
  3. Boivin, N. (2008). Material Cultures. Material Minds: The Role of Things in Human Thoughts, Society and Evolution.Google Scholar
  4. Bratman, M. (2000). Reflection, planning, and temporally extended agency. Philosophical Review, 109(1), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratman, M. (2007). Structures of agency: Essays. USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratton, B. H. (2016). The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40(10), 1183–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Chalmers, D. (2007). Forward to supersizing the mind Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, A. (2015). What ‘extended me’ knows. Synthese, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0719-z
  14. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clowes, R. W. (2012). Hybrid memory, cognitive technology and self. In Y. Erdin & M. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Clowes, R. W. (2013). The cognitive integration of E-memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clowes, R. W. (2015). Thinking in the cloud: The cognitive incorporation of cloud-based technology. Philosophy and Technology, 28(2), 261–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clowes, R. W. (2017). Extended memory. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), Routledge handbook on the philosophy of memory (pp. 243–255). Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clowes, R. W. (2018). Screen reading and the creation of new cognitive ecologies. AI & Society. Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognition onto cognitive technology. In I. E. Dror & S. Harnad (Eds.), Cognition Distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality: OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gemmell, J., & Bell, G. (2009). The E-memory revolution. Library Journal, 134(15), 20–23.Google Scholar
  25. Gosden, C., & Malafouris, L. (2015). Process archaeology (P-arch). World Archaeology, 47(5), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenfield, S. (2009). How Facebook addiction is damaging your child's brain: A leading neuroscientist's chilling warning. The Daily Mail.Google Scholar
  27. Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  28. Heersmink, R. (2015). Dimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heersmink, R. (2016). Distributed selves: personal identity and extended memory systems. Synthese, 194(8), 3135–3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heersmink, R. (2016b). The internet, cognitive enhancement, and the values of cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knappett, C. (2011). Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  35. Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material and nonhuman agency: An introduction. Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, ix-xix.Google Scholar
  36. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2014). Higher media multi-tasking activity is associated with smaller gray-matter density in the anterior cingulate cortex. PLoS One, 9(9), e106698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2015). How has the internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 1073858415595005.Google Scholar
  40. Lupton, D. (2014). Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: The future of design.Google Scholar
  41. Malafouris, L. (2004). The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. In DeMarraise E., Gosden C., & Renfrew, C. (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 53–61). Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  42. Malafouris, L. (2008). At the potter’s wheel: An argument for material agency Material agency (pp. 19–36): Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Malafouris, L. (2009). “Neuroarchaeology”: Exploring the links between neural and cultural plasticity. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malafouris, L. (2010a). Grasping the concept of number: how did the sapient mind move beyond approximation. In Morley I. & Renfrew C. (Eds.), The archaeology of measurement: comprehending heaven, earth and time in ancient societies (pp. 35–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Malafouris, L. (2010b). Metaplasticity and the human becoming: Principles of neuroarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 88(4), 49–72.Google Scholar
  46. Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malafouris, L. (2014). Creative thinging: The feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malafouris, L. (2015). Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind, 8(4), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Malafouris, L. (2016). On human becoming and incompleteness: a material engagement approach to the study of embodiment in evolution and culture. In Etzelmüller G. & Tewes C. (Eds.), Embodiment in Evolution and Culture (pp. 289–305). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  50. Menary, R. (2014). Neural plasticity, neuronal recycling and niche construction. Mind & Language, 29(3), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Michaelian, K. (2014). JFGI: from distributed cognition to distributed reliabilism*. Philosophical Issues, 24(1), 314–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, D. (2010). Stuff: Polity.Google Scholar
  53. Minear, M., Brasher, F., McCurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1274–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart (Defending human attributes in the age of the machine): Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  55. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Overmann, K. A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient near east. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(02), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palermos, S. O. (2014). Knowledge and cognitive integration. Synthese, 191(8), 1931–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simpson, T. W. (2012). Evaluating Google as an epistemic tool. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Small, G. W., & Vorgan, G. (2008). iBrain. Scientific American.Google Scholar
  62. Small, G. W., Moody, T. D., Siddarth, P., & Bookheimer, S. (2009). Your brain on Google: Patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. American Journal of Geriatric Psych, 17(2), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smart, P. R. (2012). The web-extended mind. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smart, P. R. (2014). Embodiment, cognition and the world wide web. In L. A. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Smart, P. R. (2017). Situating machine intelligence within the cognitive ecology of the internet. Minds and Machines, 27(2), 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smart, P. R. (Forthcoming). Emerging digital technologies: Implications for extended conceptions of cognition and knowledge. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Extended Epistemology Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Smart, P. R., Clowes, R. W., & Heersmink, R. (2017a). Minds online: The Interface between web science, cognitive science and the philosophy of mind. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 6(1–2), 1–232.  https://doi.org/10.1561/1800000026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smart, P. R., Heersmink, R., & Clowes, R. W. (2017b). The cognitive ecology of the the internet. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition Beyond the Brain, 2nd Edition (pp. 251-282): Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stephenson, N. (1999). In the beginning... was the command line: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  71. Sterelny, K. (2007). Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Storm, B. C., & Stone, S. M. (2015). Saving-enhanced memory the benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). London, England: Bradford Book, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tribble, E. B. (2005). Distributing cognition in the globe. Shakespeare Quarterly, 56(2), 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  78. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Ward, A. F. (2013a). One with the cloud: Why people mistake the Internet's knowledge for their own. Google Scholar
  81. Ward, A. F. (2013b). Supernormal: How the internet is changing our memories and our minds. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IFILNOVA, FCSHNew University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations