Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 623–635 | Cite as

Personality as equilibrium: fragility and plasticity in (inter-)personal identity

  • John Russon
Article
  • 195 Downloads

The fabric of human life is ontologically different from the fabric of, for example, plant life. The plant is a living process of bodily growth enacted in and as xylem, phloem, tap-roots, etc. The human, on the contrary, is a living process of inhabiting a shared world of moral striving, aesthetic contemplation, political exploitation, erotic passion, and so on, and this process is enacted in and as inherently human relationships and practices. I note this contrast, not for the sake of making an argument about the external contrast between human experience and the life-situations of other organisms, but for the heuristic purpose of orienting us to the internal project of describing human experience on its own terms.1 The understanding of the existential fabric of human life requires different sorts of interpretive categories--a different ontology--than does the understanding of the fabric of vegetal life, and it is those categories that I aim to clarify here.

Long ago, Aristotle...

Keywords

Self-identity Phenomenology Virtues of character Husserl Merleau-Ponty Aristotle Dynamic systems theory Personality development 

References

  1. Barnes, G. (1985). The epistemology of Alcoholism. Alcoholism, 21, 71–86.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1972). The cybernetics of ‘self’: A theory of alcoholism. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beith, D. (2017). Moving into being: The motor basis of perception, balance and reading. In K. Jacobson & J. Russon (Eds.), Perception and Its Development in Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology (pp. 123-141). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burwood, S. (2008). The apparent truth of dualism and the uncanny body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cachia, A. (2012). What can a body do? In What Can a Body Do? Exhibition catalog (pp. 4–8). Haverford: Haverford College.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, E. (1977). The Ecology of imagination in children. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Costello, P. (2012). Layers in Husserl’s Phenomenology: On meaning and Intersubjectivity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1982). Signature, event, context. In Margins of Philosophy (A. Bass, Trans.) (pp. 307–30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diedrich, L. (2001). Breaking down: A Phenomenology of disability. Literature and Medicine, 20, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritsch, K. (2010). Intimate assemblages: Disability, Intercorporeality, and the labour of attendant care. Critical Disability Discourse, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Gallager, S., & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A.V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude (W. McNeill and N. Walker, Trans.). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. (1988). Cartesian Meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, E. (2002). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Psychology , Vol. II (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schwur, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobson, K. (2004). Agoraphobia and hypochondria as disorders of dwelling. International Studies in Philosophy, 36, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobson, K. (2009). A developed nature: A phenomenological account of the experience of home. Continental Philosophy Review, 42, 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kant, I. (2007). Critique of Pure Reason (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  20. Mairs, N. (1996). Waist-high in the world: A life among the non-disabled. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  21. Masten, A. S., & Obradović, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nussbaum, M. (1988). Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosen S. (1972–3). Sōphrosunē and Selbstbewußtsein. Review of Metaphysics 26, 617–642.Google Scholar
  26. Russon, J. (2004). The bodily unconscious in Freud's three essays. In J. Mills (Ed.), Rereading Freud: Psychoanalysis through Philosophy (pp. 33–50). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Russon, J. (2009). Emotional subjects: Mood and articulation in Hegel’s Philosophy of mind. International Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Russon, J. (2014). Between two intimacies: The formative contexts of individual experience. Emotion Space and Society, 13, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russon, J. (2016). Subjectivity and hermeneutics. In N. Keane & C. Lawn (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics (pp. 205–211). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Sartre, J.-P. (1984). Being and Nothingness: A phenomenological essay in ontology. (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Washington Square.Google Scholar
  31. Siebers, T. (2013). Disability and the theory of complex embodiment—For identity Politics in a new register. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 278–297). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Simms, E.-M. (2001). Milk and flesh: A phenomenological reflection on infancy and coexistence. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 32, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simms, E.-M. (2010). Egocentric language and the upheaval of speech: A Merleau-Ponty inspired study of language acquisition. Chiasmi International, 12, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spitz, R. A. (1945). Hospitalism—An inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1, 53–74.Google Scholar
  35. Stolorow, R. (2013). Intersubjective systems-theory: A phenomenological-Contextualist Psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waldenfels, B. (2004). Bodily experience between selfhood and others. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker, B. & Meyers, J. A. (2004). Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological systems: A developing database. Ecology and Society, 9(2). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art3/.
  38. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
  39. Winnicott, D. W. (1964). The child, the family, and the outside world. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  40. Winnicott, D. W. (1986). The child in the family group. In Home is Where We Start From: Essays by a Psychoanalyst. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations