Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 737–751 | Cite as

Violence as violation of experiential structures

  • Thiemo BreyerEmail author
Article
  • 293 Downloads

Abstract

Violence has become a prominent topic in recent phenomenological investigations. In this paper, I wish to contribute to this ongoing discourse by looking at violence in a literal sense as violation of experiential structures, insofar as it is intentionally, purposefully, and strategically imposed on a subject by another agent (individual or collective). Phenomenology provides the descriptive methodology for elucidating such structures. The violation can take the form of a radicalization, in which one of the aspects of polar experiential spectra becomes predominant, i.e. the balance between them is shifted to one extreme. I focus on the relationship between self and other on the one hand, and the relationship between body-as-subject and body-as-object on the other, as prominent topoi in the phenomenological literature. With regard to torture and solitary confinement as forms of extreme violence, I analyze how these structures are disturbed.

Keywords

Embodiment Intersubjectivity Pain Isolation Violence Violation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the participants of the Mellon Seminar on “Violence and Non-Violence” at the Mahindra Humanities Center at Harvard University and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments. The research for this paper was carried out within the research project “Visibility and Empathy” (FN 88318), which was generously funded by the Volkswagen Foundation.

References

  1. Améry, J. (1980). At the mind’s limits. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Améry, J. (1999). On suicide: A discourse on voluntary death. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Başoğlu, M. (2009). A multivariate contextual analysis of torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatments: implications for an evidence-based definition of torture. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Başoğlu, M., Livanou, M., & Crnobarić, C. (2007). Torture vs other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent? Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(3), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenberg, H. (2006). Beschreibung des Menschen. In M. Sommer, (Ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2006). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Buytendijk, F.J.J. (1948). Über den Schmerz. (trans: Plessner, H.). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  8. Coons, P. M. (1996). Depersonalization and derealization. In L. K. Michelson & W. J. Ray (Eds.), Handbook of dissociation (pp. 291–305). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delhom, P. (2014). Phänomenologie der erlittenen Gewalt. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Gesichter der Gewalt. Beiträge aus phänomenologischer Sicht (pp. 155–174). Wilhelm Fink: Paderborn.Google Scholar
  11. Dodd, J. (2009). Violence and phenomenology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Endress, M., & Rampp, B. (2013). Special issue on Violence – Phenomenological Contributions. Human Studies, 36(1).Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Gallagher, S. (2014). The cruel and unusual phenomenology of solitary confinement. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gera, D. L. (2003). Ancient Greek ideas on speech, language, and civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grüny, C. (2003). Zur Logik der Folter. In D. Mensink & B. Liebsch (Eds.), Gewalt Verstehen (pp. 79–116). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Grüny, C. (2004). Zerstörte Erfahrung: Eine Phänomenologie des Schmerzes. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  18. Guenther, L. (2013). Solitary confinement: Social death and its afterlives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. (trans: Cairns, D.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1990). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Käll, L. F. (2013). Intercorporeality and the sharability of pain. In L. F. Käll (Ed.), Dimensions of pain: Humanities and social science perspectives (pp. 27–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Le Breton, D. (2006). Anthropologie de la douleur. Paris: Éditions Métailié.Google Scholar
  23. Leder, D. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of pain. Review of Existential Psychology & Psychiatry, 19(2-3), 255–266.Google Scholar
  24. Levinson, S. (2007). Slavery and the phenomenology of torture. Social Research, 74(1), 149–168. Accessed 12 March 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Liebsch, B., & Mensink, D. (2003). Gewalt Verstehen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs. (trans: McCleary, R.C.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. followed by working notes. In A. Lingis, Trans., C. Lefort (Ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. (trans: Smith, C.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Morris, D. (1991). The culture of pain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Plessner, H. (1970). Laughing and crying: a study of the limits of human behavior. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch: Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plügge, H. (1970). Vom Spielraum des Leibes: Klinisch-phänomenologische Erwägungen über “Körperschema” und “Phantomglied.”. Salzburg: Müller.Google Scholar
  34. Portmann, A. (1956). Zoologie und das neue Bild des Menschen. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  35. Portmann, A. (1973). Anthropologische Deutung der menschlichen Entwicklungsperiode. In A. Portmann (Ed.), Vom Lebendigen: Versuche zu einer Wissenschaft vom Menschen (pp. 75–92). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  36. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another. (trans: Blamey, K.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Santoni, R. E. (2010). Sartre on violence: Curiously ambivalent. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sartre, J.-P. (1969). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. (trans: Barnes, H.E.). New York, NY: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sironi, F. (2007). Psychopathologie des violences collectives. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  41. Sofsky, W. (1997). The order of terror: The concentration camp. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Staudigl, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Phenomenologies of violence (pp. 1–32). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  43. Taipale, J. (2012). Twofold normality: Husserl and the normative relevance of primordial constitution. Husserl Studies, 28(1), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Grunsven, J. (2014). The body exploited: Torture and the destruction of selfhood. In J. De Mul (Ed.), Plessner’s philosophical anthropology: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 149–162). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Waldenfels, B. (2015). Sozialität und Alterität: Modi sozialer Erfahrung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy, 11(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, T. D., Reinhard, D. A., Westgate, E. C., Gilbert, D. T., Ellerbeck, N., Hahn, C., et al. (2014). Just think: the challenges of the disengaged mind. Science, 345(6192), 75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy: phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-6), 151–167.Google Scholar
  51. Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and other: exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.a.r.t.e.s. Graduate School for the HumanitiesUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations