Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 253–293 | Cite as

Putting pressure on theories of choking: towards an expanded perspective on breakdown in skilled performance

Article

Abstract

There is a widespread view that well-learned skills are automated, and that attention to the performance of these skills is damaging because it disrupts the automatic processes involved in their execution. This idea serves as the basis for an account of choking in high pressure situations. On this view, choking is the result of self-focused attention induced by anxiety. Recent research in sports psychology has produced a significant body of experimental evidence widely interpreted as supporting this account of choking in certain kinds of complex sensorimotor skills. We argue against this interpretation, pointing to problems with both the empirical evidence and the underlying theory. The experimental research fails to provide direct support for the central claims of the self-focus approach, contains inconsistencies, and suffers from problems of ecological validity. In addition, qualitative studies of choking have yielded contrary results. We further argue that in their current forms the self-focus and rival distraction approaches both lack the theoretical resources to provide a good theory of choking, and we argue for an expanded approach. Some of the elements that should be in an expanded approach include accounts of the features of pressure situations that influence the psychological response, the processes of situation appraisal, and the ways that attentional control can be overwhelmed, leading to distraction in some cases, and in others, perhaps, to damaging attention to skill execution. We also suggest that choking may sometimes involve performance-impairing mechanisms other than distraction or self-focus.

Keywords

Skill Choking under pressure Self-focus Distraction Situation appraisal Sport psychology 

References

  1. Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. B. (2005). Category learning and multiple memory systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Showers, C. J. (1986). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bawden, M. A. K., & Maynard, I. W. (2001). Towards an understanding of the personal experience of the “yips” in cricketers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(12), 937–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130(4), 701–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beilock, S. L., & Gray, R. (2007). Why do athletes choke under pressure? In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 425–444). Inc: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Beilock, S. L., Wierenga, S. A., & Carr, T. H. (2002). Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(4), 1211–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bicknell, K. (2010). Feeling them ride: Corporeal exchange in cross-country mountain bike racing. About Performance, 10, 81–91.Google Scholar
  11. Birch, J. E. (2011). Skills and knowledge – nothing but memory? Sport, Ethics, and Philosophy, 5(4), 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brownstein, M. (2014). Rationalizing flow: Agency in skilled unreflective action. Philosophical Studies, 168(2), 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cappuccio, M. (forthcoming, this issue). Introduction to the special issue. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Carver, C. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaffin, R., & Logan, T. (2006). Practicing perfection: How concert soloists prepare for performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2–3), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colombetti, G. (2011). Varieties of pre-reflective self-awareness: Foreground and background bodily feelings in emotion experience. Inquiry, 54(3), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cotterill, S. T., Sanders, R., & Collins, D. (2010). Developing effective pre-performance routines in golf: Why don’t we ask the golfer? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Albert, N. B., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choking under pressure: Multiple routes to skill failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140(3), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Engstrom, J., Johansson, E., & Ostlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksen, J. W. (2010). Mindless coping in competitive sport: Some implications and consequences. Sport, Ethics, and Philosophy, 4(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  25. Geeves, A., Christensen, W. D., Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2008). Critical review: Chaffin, Imreh, & Crawford. Practicing Perfection: Memory and Piano Performance Empirical Musicology Review, 3(3), 163–172.Google Scholar
  26. Geeves, A., McIlwain, D. J. F., Sutton, J., & Christensen, W. (2014). To think or not to think: The apparent paradox of expert skill in music performance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(6), 674–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray, R. (2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 10(1), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gucciardi, D. F., & Dimmock, J. A. (2008). Choking under pressure in sensorimotor skills: Conscious processing or depleted attentional resources? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gucciardi, D. F., Longbottom, J. L., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. A. (2010). Experienced golfers’ perspectives on choking under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 61–83.Google Scholar
  30. Hanin, Y. L. (2007). Emotions in sport: current issues and perspectives. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 31–58). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Mpoumpaki, S., & Theodorakis, Y. (2009). Mechanisms underlying the self-talk–performance relationship: The effects of motivational self-talk on self-confidence and anxiety. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Fleming, S., & Matthews, N. (2009). A re-examination of choking in sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 9(4), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010a). A qualitative exploration of choking in elite golf. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 4(3), 221–240.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010b). Choking in sport: A review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Illundáin-Agurruza, J. (2013). Moving wisdom. explaining cognition through movement. FairPlay. Journal of Philosophy, Ethics, and Sports Law, 1(1), 58–87.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, R. C., Ashford, K. J., & Norsworthy, G. (2006). Attentional focus, dispositional reinvestment, and skilled motor performance under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, M. (2003). Controlling emotions in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 471–486.Google Scholar
  38. Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: an inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2(9), 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109(2), 219–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lane, A. M., Beedie, C. J., Jones, M. V., Uphill, M., & Devonport, T. J. (2012). The BASES expert statement on emotion regulation in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(11), 1189–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lazarus, R. S. (2000). How emotions influence performance in competitive sports. Sport Psychologist, 14(3), 229.Google Scholar
  44. Lopes, B., & McCormack, L. (2010). Mastering Mountain Bike Skills (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  45. Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Masters, R., & Maxwell, J. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIlwain, D. J. F., & Sutton, J. (2014). Yoga from the mat up: How words alight on bodies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(6), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIlwain, D. J. F., & Sutton, J. (forthcoming). Methods for measuring breadth and depth of knowledge. In D. Farrow & J. Baker (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Sports Expertise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Miles, A., & Neil, R. (2013). The use of self-talk during elite cricket batting performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 874–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moe, V. F. (2005). A philosophical critique of classical cognitivism in sport: From information processing to bodily background knowledge. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32, 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ohno, H., Wada, M., Saitoh, J., Sunaga, N., & Nagai, M. (2004). The effect of anxiety on postural control in humans depends on visual information processing. Neuroscience Letters, 364(1), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oudejans, R. R. D., Kuijpers, W., Kooijman, C. C., & Bakker, F. C. (2011). Thoughts and attention of athletes under pressure: Skill-focus or performance worries? Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 24(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Papineau, D. (this issue). Choking and the yips. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
  55. Peterborough Telegraph (2004). Olympic heartbreak for Melanie as she fails to make finals. (2004, August 19). URL: http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/sport/olympic-heartbreak-for-melanie-as-she-fails-to-make-finals-1-585668 (retrieved 15 August 2014).
  56. Sachdev, P. (1992). Golfers’ cramp: Clinical characteristics and evidence against it being an anxiety disorder. Movement Disorders, 7(4), 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sakai, K. (2008). Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). Kinesthetic memory. In Sheets-Johnstone, The Corporeal Turn (pp. 253–277). Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  59. Starkes, J. L., Cullen, J. D., & MacMahon, C. (2004). A life-span model of the acquisition and retention of expert perceptual-motor performance. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 260–280). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (forthcoming). Breadth and depth of knowledge in expert versus novice athletes. In D. Farrow & J. Baker (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Sports Expertise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W. D., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wada, M., Sunaga, N., & Nagai, M. (2001). Anxiety affects the postural sway of the antero-posterior axis in college students. Neuroscience Letters, 302(2–3), 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson, M. (2008). From processing efficiency to attentional control: A mechanistic account of the anxiety–performance relationship. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, M., Chattington, M., Marple-Horvat, D. E., & Smith, N. C. (2007). A comparison of self-focus versus attentional explanations of choking. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
  66. Wulf, G. (2007). Attention and motor skill learning. Human KineticsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne Christensen
    • 1
  • John Sutton
    • 1
  • Doris McIlwain
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cognitive ScienceMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations