Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 501–519 | Cite as

Husserl’s hyletic data and phenomenal consciousness

Article

Abstract

In the Logical Investigations, Ideas I and many other texts, Husserl maintains that perceptual consciousness involves the intentional “animation” or interpretation of sensory data or hyle, e.g., “color-data,” “tone-data,” and algedonic data. These data are not intrinsically representational nor are they normally themselves objects of representation, though we can attend to them in reflection. These data are “immanent” in consciousness; they survive the phenomenological reduction. They partly ground the intuitive or “in-the-flesh” aspect of perception, and they have a determinacy of character that we do not create but can only discover. This determinate, non-representational stratum of perceptual consciousness also serves as a bridge between consciousness and the world beyond it. I articulate and defend this conception of perceptual consciousness. I locate the view in the space of contemporary positions on phenomenal character and argue for its superiority. I close by briefly arguing that the Husserlian account is perfectly compatible with physicalism (this involves disarming the Grain Problem).

Keywords

Hyle Qualia Time-Consicousness Representationalism Sense data The grain problem Husserl Phenomenal consciousness Intentionality 

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1968). The headless woman illusion and the defence of materialism. Analysis, 29, 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, M. (2008). Holism and horizon: Husserl and McDowell on non-conceptual content. Husserl Studies, 24, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergmann, G. (1964) The Ontology of Edmund Husserl. In Logic and reality. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brentano, F. (1995). In A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister (Eds.), Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bubic, A., von Cramon, D., & Schubotz, R. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 25.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Cobb-Stevens, R. (1990). Husserl and analytic philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombo, M., & Seriès, P. (2012). Bayes in the brain—On Bayesian modelling in neuroscience. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63, 697–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Warren, N. (2009). Husserl and the promise of time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennett, D. (1979). Review of R. Aquila, intentionality: a study of mental acts, and E. Casey, imagining: A phenomenological analysis. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, IX, 139–143.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H. (1982). Husserl’s Perceptual Noema. In H. Dreyfus (Ed.), Husserl, intentionality, and cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Drummond, J. (2007). Historical dictionary of Husserl’s philosophy. New York: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fish, W. (2010). Philosophy of perception: A contemporary introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Føllesdal, D. (1982). Brentano and Husserl on intentional objects and perception. In H. Dreyfus (Ed.), Husserl, intentionality, and cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Føllesdal, D. (2006). Husserl’s reductions and the role they play in his phenomenology. In H. Dreyfus & M. Wrathall (Eds.), A companion to phenomenology and existentialism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Gallagher, S. (1986). Hyletic experience and the lived body. Husserl Studies, 3, 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher, S. (2003). Sync-ing in the stream of experience. Psyche, 9, 10.Google Scholar
  18. Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gurwitsch, A. (1966). Phenomenology of thematics and of the pure ego: Studies of the relation between gestalt theory and phenomenology. Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Hintikka, J. (1995). The phenomenological dimension. In B. Smith & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hopp, W. (2008). Husserl on sensation, perception, and interpretation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 38, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopp, W. (2011). Perception and knowledge: A phenomenological account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hospedales, T., & Vijayakumar, S. (2009). Multisensory oddity detection as Bayesian inference. PloS One, 4, 1.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, E. (1969). In D. Cairns (Translator), Formal and transcendental logic. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  25. Husserl, E. (1973). In J. S. Churchill & K. Ameriks (Translators), Experience and judgment. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Husserl, E. (1982). In F. Kersten (Translator), Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Husserl, E. (1991). In J. B. Brough (Translator), On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. Husserl, E. (1997). In R. Rojcewicz (Translator), Thing and space. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  29. Husserl, E. (2001). In A. Steinbock (Translator), Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  30. Julesz, B. (2006). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kriegel, U. (2002). PANIC theory and the prospects for a representational theory of phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical Psychology, 15, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madary, M. (2010). Husserl on perceptual constancy. European Journal of Philosophy, 20, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mooney, T. (2010). Understanding and simple seeing in Husserl. Husserl Studies, 26, 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mulligan, K. (1995). Perception. In B. Smith & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pacherie, E. (1999). Leibhaftigkeit and representational theories of perception. In J. Petitot, F. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Petitot, J. (1999). Morphological eidetics for a phenomenology of perception. In J. Petitot, F. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sartre, J.-P. (1994). In H. Barnes (Translator), Being and nothingness. New York: Gramercy Books.Google Scholar
  38. Shim, M. (2005). The duality of non-conceptual content in Husserl’s phenomenology of perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shim, M. (2011). Representationalism and Husserlian phenomenology. Husserl Studies, 27, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, Q. (1977). A phenomenological examination of Husserl’s theory of hyletic data. Philosophy Today, 21, 356–367.Google Scholar
  41. Sokolowksi, R. (1970). The formation of Husserl’s concept of constitution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and beyond: Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thaler, L., Arnott, S., & Goodale, M. (2011). Neural correlates of natural human echolocation in early and late blind echolocation experts. PloS One, 6, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson, E., Noë, A., & Pessoa, L. (1999). Perceptual completion: A case study in phenomenology and cognitive science. In J. Petitot, F. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, color and content. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Williford, K. (2007). The logic of phenomenal transparency. Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16, 181–195.Google Scholar
  47. Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas, ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations