Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 769–790 | Cite as

The You-I event: on the genesis of self-awareness



I present empirical evidence suggesting that an infant first becomes aware of herself as the focal center of a caregiver's attending. Yet that does not account for her awareness of herself as agent. To address this question, I bring in research on neonatal imitation, as well as studies demonstrating the existence of a neural system in which parts of the same brain areas are activated when observing another's action and when executing a similar one. Applying these findings, I consider gestural exchanges between infant and caregiver, such as reciprocal smiles and imitative vocalizations. Lacking self-awareness at first, the infant is unaware of her own agency. By returning her unwitting gesture, the caregiver singles out for her—thanks to neural matching—the gesture's kinesthesis. Moreover, the caregiver's smile, imitative vocalization, or other gesture is the form that focusing takes. The kinesthesis of the infant's gesture, in being singled out, is experienced by the infant as what the caregiver is focusing on. It is experienced as being within the focal center. In this way, the infant becomes aware of herself as a bodily entity acting toward the caregiver. Exchanges that involve matching are at first essential, I argue, in making the infant present to herself in action. Matching will cease to be necessary, but self-awareness continues to depend fundamentally on others until the acquisition of language, when the child becomes capable of talking to herself as if she were the caregiver.


Protoconversation Intersubjectivity Self-awareness Husserl Dialogue Second-person 


  1. Anisfeld, M. (1996). Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review, 16, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisfeld, M., Turkewitz, G., Rose, S. A., Rosenberg, F. R., Sheiber, F. J., Couturier-Fagan, D. A., et al. (2001). No compelling evidence that newborns imitate oral gestures. Infancy, 2(1), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard, K. A. (2007). Neonatal imitation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tested with two paradigms. Animal Cognition, 10, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bermúdez, J. L. (1996). The moral significance of birth. Ethics, 106, 378–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigelow, A. E. (1995). The effect of blindness on the early development of the self. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: theory and research (pp. 327–347). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mother’s face recognition in newborn infants: learning and memory. Infant and Child Development, 10, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bushnell, I. W. R., Sai, F., & Mullin, J. T. (1989). Neonatal recognition of the mother’s face. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butterworth, G. (1998). Origins of joint visual attention in infancy. In M. Carpenter, K. Nagell, M. Tomasello, et al. Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age (pp. 144–166). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4).Google Scholar
  9. Castiello, U., Becchio, C., Zoia, S., Nelini, C., Sartori, L., Blason, L., et al. (2010). Wired to be social: the ontogeny of human interaction. PLoS One, 5(10), e13199. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craighero, L., Leo, I., Umiltà, C., & Simion, F. (2011). Newborns’ preference for goal-directed actions. Cognition. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.011.
  11. DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science, 208(4448), 1174–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73(6), 2608–2611.Google Scholar
  14. Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye detection in humans from birth. PNAS, 99(14), 9602–9605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrari, P. F., Pauker, A., Ruggiero, A., Darcey, L., Unbehagen, S., & Suomi, S. J. (2009). Interindividual differences in neonatal imitation and the development of action chains in rhesus macaques. Child Development, 80(4), 1057–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrari, P. F., Vanderwert, R., Herman, K., Paukner, A., Fox, N. A., & Suomi, S. J. (2008). EEG activity in response to facial gestures in 1–7 days old infant rhesus macaques. Social Neuroscience, 297, 13. Abs.Google Scholar
  17. Ferrari, P. F., Visalberghi, E., Paukner, A., Fogassi, L., Ruggiero, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2006). Neonatal imitation in rhesus macaques. PLoS Biology, 4(9), e302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R., & Cohen, D. (1982). Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science, 218(4568), 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The primary triangle. A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers and infants. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  20. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  21. Fontaine, R. (1984). Imitative skills between birth and six months. Infant Behavior & Development, 7(3), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freud, A., & Dann, S. (1951). An experiment in group upbringing. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 6, 127–168.Google Scholar
  23. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallagher, S. (1996). The moral significance of primitive self-consciousness: a response to Bermúdez. Ethics, 107(1), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  26. Gallagher, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: an introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W. (1996). Infant sensitivity to adult eye direction. Child Development, 67(5), 1940–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hundeide, K. (2007). When empathic care is obstructed: excluding the child from the zone of intimacy. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved: from mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 237–256). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  31. Hunt, J. M. V., Mohandessi, K., Ghodssi, M., & Akiyama, M. (1976). Development of orphanage-reared infants (Tehran): interventions and outcomes. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 94(2), 177–226.Google Scholar
  32. Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  33. Husserl, E. (1966a). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917). Husserliana X. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  34. Husserl, E. (1966b). Analysen zur passiven Synthesis (1918–1926). Husserliana XI. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. English translation 2001, with additional texts: Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic (trans: Steinbock A. J.). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, E. (1973a). Ding und Raum: Vorlesungen 1907. Husserliana XVI. Den Haag, The Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. (1973b). Experience and judgment: investigations in a genealogy of logic (trans: Churchill, J. S. & Ameriks, K.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Husserl, E. (1973c). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Husserliana XV. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  38. Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.
  39. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. James, W. (1918). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, S. S. (2009). The development of imitation in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2325–2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaye, K. (1977). Toward the origin of dialogue. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother–infant interaction (pp. 89–117). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  43. Kinsbourne, M. (2002). The role of imitation in body ownership and mental growth. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 311–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krueger, J. (2012). Seeing mind in action. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 149–173. doi:10.1007/s11097-011-9226-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kugiumutzakis, G. (1999). Genesis and development of early infant mimesis to facial and vocal models. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 36–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lavelli, M., & Poli, M. (1998). Early mother–infant interaction during breast- and bottle-feeding. Infant Behavior & Development, 21(4), 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Legerstee, M. (1991). The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51(3), 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Legerstee, M., Markova, G., & Fisher, T. (2007). The role of maternal affect attunement in dyadic and triadic communication. Infant Behavior & Development, 30, 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lepage, J., & Théoret, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system: grasping others’ actions from birth? Developmental Science, 10(5), 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). "Like me": a foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10(1), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meltzoff, A. N., & Brooks, R. (2001). "Like me" as a building block for understanding other minds: bodily acts, attention, and intention. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: foundations of social cognition (pp. 171–191). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons. Infant Behavior & Development, 17, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and non-sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, C.). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  60. Mojzisch, A., Schilbach, L., Pannasch, S., Helmert, J. R., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Vogeley, K. (2006). The effects of self-involvement on attention, arousal, and facial expression during social interaction with virtual others: a psychophysiological study. Social Neuroscience, 1, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Muir, D., & Hains, S. (1999). Young infants' perception of adult intentionality: adult contingency and eye direction. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 155–188). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (2004). Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Science, 7, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nadel, J., & Tremblay-Leveau, H. (1999). Early perception of social contingencies and interpersonal intentionality: dyadic and triadic paradigms. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 189–212). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Nyström, P. (2008). The infant mirror neuron system studied with high density EEG. Social Neuroscience, 3, 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Overgaard, S. (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on being in the world. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Overgaard, S. (2007). Wittgenstein and other minds: rethinking subjectivity and intersubjectivity with Wittgenstein, Levinas, and Husserl. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Papoušek, M. (1995). Origins of reciprocity and mutuality in prelinguistic parent–infant 'dialogues'. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 58–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Pascalis, O., de Schonen, S., Morton, J., Deruelle, C., & Fabre-Grenet, M. (1995). Mother’s face recognition by neonates—a replication and extension. Infant Behavior & Development, 18, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children (trans: Cook, M.) . New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  70. Reddy, V. (1999). Prelinguistic communication. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 25–50). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  71. Reddy, V. (2000). Coyness in early infancy. Developmental Science, 3(2), 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: implications for self-other consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rochat, P. (2001). The infant's world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rochat, P. (2009). Others in mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rochat, P. (2011). The self as phenotype. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosenthal, M. K. (1982). Vocal dialogues in the neonatal period. Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rutter, M., O'Connor, T. G., & The English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. (2004). Are there biological programming effects for psychological development? Findings from a study of Romanian adoptees. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Saxe, R. (2006). Boston review. Cambridge, MA (July–August 2006).Google Scholar
  81. Scheler, M. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
  82. Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Mojzisch, A., & Vogeley, K. (2008). What’s in a smile? Neural correlates of facial embodiment during social interaction. Social Neuroscience, 3(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schögler, B., & Trevarthen, C. (2007). To sing and dance together: from infants to jazz. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved: from mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 279–299). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  84. Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: the problem of social reality. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  85. Shimada, S., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Infant's brain responses to live and televised action. NeuroImage, 32, 930–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  87. Sparling, J. W., Van Tol, J., & Chescheir, N. C. (1999). Fetal and neonatal hand movement. Physical Therapy, 79, 24–39.Google Scholar
  88. Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  89. Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Streri, A., & Gentaz, E. (2003). Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 20, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother–infant interaction (pp. 227–270). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  92. Trevarthen, C. (1984). Emotion in infancy: regulators of contact and relationships with persons. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 129–157). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  93. Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Turati, C., Bulf, H., & Simion, F. (2008). Newborns’ face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Cognition, 106, 1300–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. von Hofsten, C., & Rosander, K. (1997). Development of smooth pursuit tracking in young infants. Vision Research, 37, 1799–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Waldenfels, B. (1971). Das Zwischenreich des Dialogs: Sozial-philosophische Untersuchungen in Anschluss am Edmund Husserl. Den Haag: The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  98. Walton, H. H., Bower, N. J., & Bower, T. G. (1992). Recognition of familiar faces by newborns. Infant Behavior & Development, 15(2), 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Watson, J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and “the game”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323–339.Google Scholar
  100. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Rovet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wilson, A., & Weinstein, L. (1990). Language, thought, and interiorization—a Vygotskian and psychoanalytic perspective. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26, 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology I (trans: Anscombe, G. E. M.) . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  103. Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology II (trans: Luckhardt, C. G. & Aue, M. A.E.) . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  104. Wolff, P. H. (1987). The development of behavioral states and the expression of emotions in early infancy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  105. Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: investigating the first-person perspective. Denver: Bradford. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  107. Zoia, S., Blason, L., D’Ottavio, G., Bulgheroni, M., Pezzetta, E., Scabar, A., et al. (2007). Evidence of early development of action planning in the human foetus: a kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Honors College at the University of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.HolonIsrael

Personalised recommendations