Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–26 | Cite as

Making it mental: in search for the golden mean of the extended cognition controversy

Article

Abstract

This paper engages the extended cognition controversy by advancing a theory which fits nicely into an attractive and surprisingly unoccupied conceptual niche situated comfortably between traditional individualism and the radical externalism espoused by the majority of supporters of the extended mind hypothesis. I call this theory moderate active externalism, or MAE. In alliance with other externalist theories of cognition, MAE is committed to the view that certain cognitive processes extend across brain, body, and world—a conclusion which follows from a theory I develop in “Synergic Coordination: an argument for cognitive process externalism.” Yet, in contradistinction with radical externalism, and in agreement with the internalist orthodoxy, MAE defends the view that mental states are situated invariably inside our heads. This is done, inter alia, by developing a novel hypothesis regarding the vehicles of content (in “Extended cognition without externalized mental states”, and by criticizing arguments in support of mental states externalism (in “Reflections and objections”). The result, I believe, is a coherent theoretical alternative worthy of serious consideration.

Keywords

Cognitive engagement Intrinsic content Instantiative vehicles of content Mental states externalism Moderate active externalism Parity principle Process externalism Radical externalism Synergic coordination Transformative vehicles of content 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Kyung Hee University in the year 2011. An early draft of the manuscript was presented at the Interactivist Summer Institute in Syros, Greece (July 30, 2011) as well as at the Korean Society of Analytic Philosophy (April 28, 2012). I thank the participants for their helpful comments and for their encouragement. I would also like to thank Alex Levine and Hyundeuk Cheon for reading an early version of the manuscript, Andy Clark and Dan Weiskopf for helpful personal communication, and two anonymous referees for this journal for their tremendously helpful comments.

References

  1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Aizawa, K., & Adams, F. (2005). Defending non-derived content. Philosophical Psychology, 8(6), 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barham, J. (1996). A dynamical model of meaning and information. Biosystems, 38, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickhard, M. H. (1999). Interaction and representation. Theory and Psychology, 9(4), 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickhard, M. H. (2000). Information and representation in autonomous agents. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickhard, M. H., & Richie, D. M. (1983). On the nature of representation: A case study of James Gibson’s theory of perception. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar
  9. Block, N. (2005). Review of Alva Noë, action in perception. Journal of Philosophy, 102, 259–272.Google Scholar
  10. Brighton, H., & Todd, P.M. (2009). Situating rationality: Ecologically rational decision making with simple heuristics. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. In P. French, T. Uehling Jr., & T. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy vol. 4: Metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, W. D., & Bickhard, M. H. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist, 85(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  14. Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2000). An interactivist–constructivist approach to intelligence: Self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology, 13(1), 5–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clancey, B. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, A. (1998). Author’s response: Review symposium on being there. Metascience, 7, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A. (2005). Intrinsic content, active memory, and the extended mind. Analysis, 65, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, A. (2010a). Memento’s revenge: The extended mind extended. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 43–66). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A. (2010b). Coupling, constitution, and the cognitive kind: A reply to Adams and Aizawa. In. R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 81–100). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dennett, D. C. (1987). Evolution, error, and intentionality. In The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford.Google Scholar
  23. Dennett, D. C. (1990). The myth of original intentionality. In K. A. Mohyeldin Said, W. H. Newton-Smith, R. Viale, & K. V. Wilkes (Eds.), Modeling the mind (pp. 43–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  25. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex Arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
  27. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford.Google Scholar
  30. Gallagher, S. (2009). Philosophical antecedents of situated cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gibbs, R. W. (2001). Intentions as emergent products of social interaction. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  33. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: LEA.Google Scholar
  34. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard.Google Scholar
  35. Grush, R. (2003). In defense of some “Cartesian” assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 53–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Having thought (pp. 207–237). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hooker, C. A. (2009). Interaction and bio-cognitive order. Synthese, 166, 513–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Horgan, T., & Kriegel, U. (2008). Phenomenal intentionality meets the extended mind. The Monist, 91, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurley, S. L. (1998). Vehicles, contents, conceptual structure, and externalism. Analysis, 58(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hurley, S. L. (2010). The varieties of externalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 101–154). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hutchins, E. (2010). Enculturing the supersized mind. Philosophical Studies, 152, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kripke, S.A. (1972/1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave-McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Millikan, R. G. (1989). Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy, 86(6), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Millikan, R. G. (1991). Perceptual content and Fregean myth. Mind, 100, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moreno, A., & Lasa, A. (2003). From basic adaptivity to early mind: The origin and evolution of cognitive capacities. Evolution and Cognition, 9(1), 12–24.Google Scholar
  50. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. O’Brien, G. (1998). Being there: Review symposium. Metascience, 7, 78–83.Google Scholar
  52. Preston, J. (2010). The extended mind, the concept of belief, and epistemic credit. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 355–370). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche, 12(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  54. Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘Meaning’. In H. Putnam (Ed.), Mind language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rockwell, T. (2005). Neither brain, nor ghost. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. London: Acumen.Google Scholar
  59. Rowlands, M. (2006). Body language: Representation in action. Cambridge: Bradford/MIT.Google Scholar
  60. Rowlands, M. (2009). Situated representation. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 117–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 1–40.Google Scholar
  62. Shani, I. (2006). Narcissistic sensations and intentional directedness: How second-order cybernetics helps dissolve the tension between the egocentric character of sensory information and the (seemingly) world-centered character of cognitive representations, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 13 (3), 87–110.Google Scholar
  63. Shani, I. (2007). Teleonomic functions and intrinsic intentionality: Dretske’s theory as a test case. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 8, 15–27.Google Scholar
  64. Shani, I. (2011). Aim that Bow!: An interactivist gaze at the problem of intentional tracking. Special issue: Does process matter: Interactivism and ontology (guest editor Mark H. Bickhard). Axiomathes, 21(1), 67–97.Google Scholar
  65. Silberstein, M., & Chemero, A. (2011). Dynamics, agency, and intentional action. Humana Mente, 15, 1–19.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, B. C. (1999). Situatedness/embeddedness. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 769–770). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2009). The social context of cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 454–466). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sutton, J. (2009). Remembering. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), The extended mind (pp. 217–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In. R. Menary (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 189–226). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2007). Nano-intentionality: A defense of intrinsic intentionality. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Theiner, G. (2011). Res cogitans extensa: A philosophical defense of the extended mind thesis. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  72. Tribble, E. (2005). Distributing cognition in the globe. Shakespeare Quarterly, 56, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Uexküll, J. (1934/2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With A Theory of Meaning (Posthumanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  74. van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91, 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  76. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weiskopf, D. A. (2008). Patrolling the mind’s boundaries. Erkenntnis, 68(2), 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson, R. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson, R. (2010). Meaning making and the mind of the externalist. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 167–188). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. Yoshimi, J. (2012). Active internalism and open dynamical systems. Philosophical Psychology, 25(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyKyung Hee UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations