Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 79–94 | Cite as

Embodied technology and the dangers of using the phone while driving

  • Robert Rosenberger


Contemporary scientific research and public policy are not in agreement over what should be done to address the dangers that result from the drop in driving performance that occurs as a driver talks on a cellular phone. One response to this threat to traffic safety has been the banning in a number of countries and some states in the USA of handheld cell phone use while driving. However, research shows that the use of hands-free phones (such as headsets and dashboard-mounted speakers) also accompanies a drop, leading some to recommend regulation of both kinds of mobile phones. In what follows, I draw out the accounts of the driving impairment associated with phone use implicit in research and policy and develop an alternative account grounded in philosophical considerations. Building on work in a school of thought called postphenomenology, I review and expand concepts useful for articulating human bodily and perceptual relations to technology. By applying these ideas to the case of driving while talking on the phone, I offer an account of the drop in driving performance which focuses on the embodied relationships users develop with the car and the phone, and I consider implications for research and policy.


Cellular phone Driver distraction Traffic safety Postphenomenology Field composition Sedimentation 



Special thanks to Michael Hoffmann, Sabrina Hom, Nancy Nersessian, Bryan Norton, and Victor Wanningen for comments on earlier drafts of this piece.


  1. Alm, H., & Nillson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree phones—a simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alm, H., & Nillson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(5), 707–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beede, K. E., & Kass, S. J. (2006). Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookhuis, K. A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707–715.Google Scholar
  5. Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Scialfa, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1282–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Consiglio, W., Driscoll, P., Witte, M., & Berg, W. P. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in breaking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008). Effects of simulator practice and real-world experience on cell-phone-related driver distraction. Human Factors, 50(6), 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlton, S. G. (2009). Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crundall, D., Bains, M., Chapman, P., & Underwood, G. (2005). Regulating conversation during driving: a problem for mobile phones? Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour., 8, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008). Passenger and cell-phone conversations in simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14(4), 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drews, F. A., & Strayer, D. L. (2009). Cell phones and driver distraction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, & K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 169–190). CRC: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  12. Gurwitch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Haigney, D. E., Taylor, R. G., & Westerman, S. J. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Research Part F., 3, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock, P. A., Lesch, M., & Simmons, L. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (1953). Being and time, trans. J. Stambaugh, 1996. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  16. Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M. A., Triggs, T. J., & Brown, J. (2006). Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horrey, H. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2004). Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human Factors, 46(4), 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunton, J., & Rose, J. M. (2005). Cellular telephones and driving performance: the effects of attentional demands on motor vehicle risk. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 855–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice: phenomenologies of sound (2nd ed.). Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  21. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: the Peking University Lectures. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  22. Ishigami, Y., & Klein, R. M. (2009). Is hands-free phone safer than handheld phone? Journal of Safety Research, 40, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F., 8, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Just, M. A., Timothy, A. K., & Cynkar, J. (2008). A decrease in brain activation associated with driving and listening to someone speak. Brain Research, 1205, 70–80.Google Scholar
  25. Kunar, M. A., Carter, R., Cohen, M., & Horowitz, T. D. (2008). Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1135–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laberge-Nadeau, C., Maag, U., Bellavance, F., Lapierre, S. D., Desjardins, D., Messier, S., et al. (2003). Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 449–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Sciences., 17, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, B.-S., & Lee, Y.-H. (2005). Effects of car-phone use and aggressive disposition during critical driving maneuvers. Transportation Research Part F., 8, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazzae, E. N., M. Goodman, W. R. Garrott, & T. A. Ranney. (2005). NHTSA’s research program on wireless phone driver interface effects. In: Proceedings of the 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, paper no. 05–0375. Washington, DC: Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
  31. McCartt, A. T., Hellinga, L. A., & Bratiman, K. A. (2006). Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Injury Prevention, 7, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McEvoy, S. P., MR, Stevenson, McCartt, A. T., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P., et al. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55. published 12 July 2005.
  33. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Parkes, A. M. (1991). Drivers’ business decision making ability whilst using carphones. In E. Lovessey (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics: proceedings of the 14th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (pp. 427–432). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  35. Patten, C. J. D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Redelmeier, D. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Regan, M. A., Young, K. L., & Lee, J. D. (2009). Introduction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, & K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 3–7). CRC: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenberger, R. (2009). Quick-freezing philosophy: an analysis of imaging technologies in neurobiology. In: J.-K. B. Olsen, E. Selinger, and S. Riis (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of technology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenberger, R. (2010). The spatial experience of telephone use. Environment, Space, Place. 2(2): 63–77.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenbloom, T. (2006). Driving performance while using cell phones: an observational study. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sagberg, F. (2001). Accident risk of car drivers during mobile telephone use. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 26(1), 57–69.Google Scholar
  42. Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N., & Compton, R. (2005). Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48(2), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-phone-induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stutts, J. C., J. Feaganes, E. Rodgman, C. Hamlett, D. Reinfurt, K. Gish, M. Mercadante, & L. Staplin. (2003). The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving. In: Proceedings of the 47th annual conference of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, pp. 235–252. Barrington: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.Google Scholar
  47. Törnros, J. E. B., & Bolling, A. K. (2005). Mobile phone use—effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 902–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Törnros, J., & Bolling, A. (2006). Mobile phone use—effects of conversation on mental workload and driving speed in rural and urban environments. Transportation Research Part F., 9, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Treffner, P. J., & Barrett, R. (2004). “Hands-free mobile phone speech while driving degrades coordination and control. Transportation Research Part F., 7, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. State College: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Viotani, J. M., & Marshall, J. R. (1996). Cellular phones and traffic accidents: an epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. (2005). 100-Car naturalistic driving study tracks drivers for a year. Press Release, June 10th.
  53. Young, K. L., & Regan, M. (2007). Driver distraction: a review of the literature. In I. J. Faulks, M. Regan, M. Stevenson, J. Brown, A. Porter, & J. D. Irwin (Eds.), Distracted driving (pp. 379–405). Sydney: Australisian College of Road Safety.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public PolicyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations