Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 637–654

Thought insertion: Abnormal sense of thought agency or thought endorsement?

Article

Abstract

The standard approach to the core phenomenology of thought insertion characterizes it in terms of a normal sense of thought ownership coupled with an abnormal sense of thought agency. Recently, Fernández (2010) has argued that there are crucial problems with this approach and has proposed instead that what goes wrong fundamentally in such a phenomenology is a sense of thought commitment, characterized in terms of thought endorsement. In this paper, we argue that even though Fernández raises new issues that enrich the topic, his proposal cannot rival the version of the standard approach we shall defend.

Keywords

Thought insertion Sense of thought ownership Sense of thought agency Sense of thought endorsement Self-knowledge Folk psychology Schizophrenia 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bayne, T., & Pacherie, E. (2005). In defence of the doxastic conception of delusions. Mind & Language, 20, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billon, A. (2011). Does consciousness entail subjectivity? The puzzle of thought insertion. Philosophical Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Bortolotti, L., & Broome, M. (2009). A role for ownership and authorship in the analysis of thought insertion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckareff, A. (2005). How (not) to think about mental action. Philosophical Explorations, 8, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. (2002). The ownership of thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 9, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carruthers, G. (2007). A model of the synchronic self. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carruthers, P. (2009a). Action-awareness and the active mind. Philosophical Papers, 38, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carruthers, P. (2009b). How we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 121–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currie, G. (2000). Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. In M. Coltheart & M. Davies (Eds.), Pathologies of belief (pp. 167–182). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Fernández, J. (2003). Privileged access naturalized. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 252–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández, J. (2010). Thought insertion and self-knowledge. Mind & Language, 25, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fish, F. (1976). Fish’s schizophrenia (2nd ed.). Bristol: J. Wright.Google Scholar
  15. Frith, C. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Gallagher, S. (2000). Self-reference and schizophrenia: a cognitive model of immunity to error through misidentification. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), Exploring the self: philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience (pp. 203–239). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  17. Gallagher, S. (2004). Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: a neurophenomenological critique. Psychopathology, 37, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher, S. (2011). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.003.
  19. Garety, P. A., & Hemsley, D. R. (1994). Delusions: Investigations into the psychology of delusional reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gerrans, P. (2001). Authorship and ownership of thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 8, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gertler, B. (2008). Self-knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/self-knowledge/. Accessed October 2010.
  22. Graham, G., & Stephens, G. L. (2000). When self-consciousness breaks. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grice, P. (1991). Logic and conversation. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics—a reader (pp. 305–315). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hoerl, C. (2001). On thought insertion. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 8, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, M. C., & Fulford, K. W. M. (1997). Spiritual experience and psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 4, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaspers, K. (1963). General psychopathology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Koehler, K. (1979). First rank symptoms of schizophrenia: questions concerning clinical boundaries. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langland-Hassan, P. (2008). Fractured phenomenologies: thought insertion, inner speech, and the puzzle of extraneity. Mind & Language, 23, 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mele, A. (2009). Mental action: a case study. In L. O’Brien & M. Soteriou (Eds.), Mental actions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mellor, C. S. (1970). First rank symptoms of schizophrenia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 117, 15–23.Google Scholar
  32. Mullins, S., & Spence, S. A. (2003). Re-examining thought insertion. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mind reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. O’Grady, J. C. (1990). The prevalence and diagnostic significance of Schneiderian first-rank symptoms in a random sample of acute psychiatric in-patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oltmanns, T. F., & Maher, B. A. (Eds.). (1988). Delusional beliefs. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of agency: a conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peacocke, C. (2007). Mental action and self-awareness. In J. Cohen & B. McLaughlin (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the philosophy of mind (pp. 358–376). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Proust, J. (2006). Agency in schizophrenia from a control theory viewpoint. In N. Sebanz & W. Prinz (Eds.), Disorders of volition (pp. 87–118). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Radden, J. (2010). On delusions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Stephens, G. L., & Graham, G. (1994). Self-consciousness, mental agency, and the clinical psychopathology of thought insertion. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 1(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  41. Strawson, G. (2003). Mental ballistics or the involuntariness of spontaneity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103/3, 227–257.Google Scholar
  42. Synofzik, M., Vosegerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, M. A., & Heiser, J. F. (1971). Phenomenology: an alternative approach to diagnosis of mental disease. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 12, 480–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thornton, T. (2002). Thought insertion, cognitivism and inner space. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 7(3), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2007). Thoughts, motor actions, and the self. Mind & Language, 22, 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  47. Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E., & Sartorius, N. (1974). Measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Young, G. (2008). On how a child’s awareness of thinking informs explanations of thought insertion. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 848–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cognition and CultureQueen’s UniversityBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations