Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 417–436 | Cite as

Adding Deleuze to the mix

  • John Protevi
Article

Abstract

In this article I will suggest ways in which adding the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze to the mix can complement and extend the 4EA approach to cognitive science. In the first part of the paper, I will show how the Deleuzean tripartite ontological difference (virtual/intensive/actual) can provide an explicit ontology for dynamical systems theory. The second part will take these ontological notions and apply them to three areas of concern to the 4EA approaches: (a) the Deleuzean concept of the virtual will clarify the ontological status of perceptual capacity as sensorimotor skill; (b) the Deleuzean concept of “intensive individuation” will clarify the ontological status of the genesis of perceptually guided behavior; (c) the Deleuzean critique of confusing the actual and the virtual will enable us to intervene in the realism/idealism debate. These aspects will not be addressed sequentially but will be interwoven into an unfolding argument.

Keywords

Deleuze Cognitive science Embodied mind 

References

  1. Barnes, J. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised oxford translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J. (2006). Philosophy at the edge of chaos. Gilles Deleuze and the philosophy of difference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, H. (2004). E. coli in motion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and memory. Translated by NM Paul and WS Palmer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Braver, L. (2007). A thing of this world: A history of continental anti-realism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, D. (2009). Wetware: A computer in every living cell. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, L. (2008). Difference and givenness: Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeLanda, M. (1997). A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  12. DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. (1990). Logic of sense. Translated by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Translated by Tom Conley. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dreyfus, H. (2007). Why Heideggerian AI failed, and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, W. J. (2000a). How brains make up their minds. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, W. J. (2000b). Emotion is essential to all intentional behaviors. In M. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hughes, J. (2009). Deleuze’s difference and repetition: A reader’s guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: an experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Massumi, B. (1992). A user’s guide to capitalism and schizophrenia. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. McBeath, M. K., Shaffer, D. M., & Kaiser, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268(5210), 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Prinz, J. (2004). Gut reactions: A perceptual theory of emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality. Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Simondon, G. (1995). L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. Grenoble: Editions Jérôme Million.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 418–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toscano, A. (2006). Theatre of production: Philosophy and individuation between Kant and Deleuze. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Varela, F. J. (1995). Resonant cell assemblies: a new approach to cognitive functions and neuronal synchrony. Biological Research, 28, 81–95.Google Scholar
  39. Varela, F. J., Lachaux, F. J., Rodriguez, J.-P., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Villani, A. (1999). La guêpe et l’orchidée: Essai sur Gilles Deleuze. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  41. Wheeler, M. (1997). Cognition’s coming home: the reunion of mind and life. In P. Husbands & I. Harvey (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth European conference on artificial life (pp. 10–19). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wheeler, M. (2010). In defense of extended functionalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, J. (2003). Gilles Deleuze’s difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, J. (2008). Gilles Deleuze’s logic of sense: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of French StudiesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations