Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 429–444 | Cite as

Affective intentionality and the feeling body

  • Jan SlabyEmail author


This text addresses a problem that is not sufficiently dealt with in most of the recent literature on emotion and feeling. The problem is a general underestimation of the extent to which affective intentionality is essentially bodily. Affective intentionality is the sui generis type of world-directedness that most affective states – most clearly the emotions – display. Many theorists of emotion overlook the extent to which intentional feelings are essentially bodily feelings. The important but quite often overlooked fact is that the bodily feelings in question are not the regularly treated, non-intentional bodily sensations (known from Jamesian accounts of emotion), but rather crucial carriers of world-directed intentionality. Consequently, most theories of human emotions and feelings recently advocated are deficient in terms of phenomenological adequacy. This text tries to make up for this deficit and develops a catalogue of five central features of intentional bodily feelings. In addition, Jesse Prinz’s embodied appraisal theory is criticized as an exemplary case of the misconstrual of the bodily nature of affective experience in naturalistic philosophy of mind.


Emotion Feeling Affective intentionality Experience Body 


  1. Crane, T. (1998). Intentionality as the mark of the mental. In A. O’Hear (Ed.) Contemporary issues in the philosophy of mind (pp. 229–251). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  2. Crane, T. (2001). Elements of mind. An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  3. Döring, S. (2003). Explaining action by emotion. Philosophical Quarterly, 211, 14–30.Google Scholar
  4. Döring, S. (2007). Seeing what to do: Affective perception and rational motivation. Dialectica, 61, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  6. Goldie, P. (2000). The emotions. A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  7. Goldie, P. (2002). Emotions, feelings and intentionality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helm, B. (2001). Emotional reason. Deliberation, motivation, and the nature of value. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  9. Helm, B. (2002). Felt evaluations. A theory of pleasures and pains. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 13–30.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion. Mind, 9, 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  13. Prinz, J. (2004a). Gut reactions. A perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford/New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  14. Prinz, J. (2004b). Which emotions are basic. In P. Cruse, & D. Evans (Eds.) Emotion, evolution, and rationality (pp. 69–87). Oxford New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  15. Pugmire, D. (2006). Emotion and emotion science. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 2, 7–27.Google Scholar
  16. Ratcliffe, M. J. (2002). Heidegger’s attunement and the neuropsychology of emotion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratcliffe, M. J. (2005). The feeling of being. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12, 43–60.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, R. C. (2003). Emotions. An essay in aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  19. Schmitz, H. (1995). Der unerschöpfliche Gegenstand. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, R. C. (1976/1993). The Passions. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of OsnabrueckOsnabrueckGermany

Personalised recommendations