Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 263–278 | Cite as

The apparent truth of dualism and the uncanny body

  • Stephen BurwoodEmail author


It has been suggested that our experiences of embodiment in general appear to constitute an experiential ground for dualist philosophy and that this is particularly so with experiences of dissociation, in which one feels estranged from one’s body. Thus, Drew Leder argues that these play “a crucial role in encouraging and supporting Cartesian dualism” as they “seem to support the doctrine of an immaterial mind trapped inside an alien body”. In this paper I argue that as dualism does not capture the character of such experiences there is not even an apparent separation of self and body revealed here and that one’s body is experienced as uncanny rather than alien. The general relationship between our philosophical theorizing and the phenomenology of lived experience is also considered.


Body Dissociation Objectification Uncanny Leder Zaner Fanon 


  1. Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
  2. Charles, H. (1992). Whiteness—The relevance of politically colouring the “Non”. In H. Hinds, A. Phoenix & J. Stacey (Eds.), Working out: New directions for women’s studies. Brighton: Falmer Press (pp. 29–35).Google Scholar
  3. De Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex, trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. De Beauvoir, S. (1962). The prime of life, trans. P. Green. Cleveland: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  5. Descartes, R. (I–III). (1985–1991). The philosophical writings of Descartes, 3 volumes, trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch & A. Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The soul of black folk. New York: Dover Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Dyer, R. (1997). White. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Fanon, F. (1986). Black skin, white masks, trans. C. L. Markmann 1967. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). The structure of behaviour, trans. A. L. Fisher. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  12. Nussbaum, M. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and public affairs, 24(4), 249–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Plügge, H. (1970). ‘Man and his body’, In S. F. Spicker (Ed.) The philosophy of the body. Chicago: Quadrangle Books (pp. 293–311).Google Scholar
  14. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sartre, J. P. (2001). ‘Black Orpheus’, trans. J. MacCombie 1964, In R. Bernasconi (Ed.) Race. Oxford: Blackwell (pp. 115–142).Google Scholar
  16. Sartre, J. P. (2003). Being and nothingness, trans. H. E. Barnes 1958. London & New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, P. C. (2004). Race: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. van den Berg, J. H. (1966). The psychology of the sickbed. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility, and spatiality. Human Studies, 3(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zaner, R. M. (1973). The subjectivity of the human body. Main Currents in American Thought, 29, 117–120.Google Scholar
  22. Zaner, R. M. (1981). The context of self. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations