Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 293–307

Ontology, matter and emergence

Article

Abstract

“Ontological emergence” of inherent high-level properties with causal powers is witnessed nowhere. A non-substantialist conception of emergence works much better. It allows downward causation, provided our concept of causality is transformed accordingly.

Key words

emergence causality consciousness neuroscience 

References

  1. Bickhard, M., & Campbell, D. T. (2000). Emergence. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmerche, N. O. Finnemann, & P. V. Christiansen (Eds.) Downward causation. Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bitbol, M. (1996). Schrödinger’s Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Bitbol, M. (2002). Science as if situation mattered. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 1, 181–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao, T. Y., & Schweber, S. S. (1993). The conceptual foundations and the philosophical aspects of renormalization theory. Synthese, 97, 33–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellani, E. (2002). Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deacon, T. W. (2003). The hierarchic logic of emergence: untangling the interdependence of evolution and self-organization. In B. Weber, & D. Depew (Eds.) Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Flanagan, O. (1998). Conscious inessentialism and the epiphenomenalist suspicion. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Guzeldere (Eds.) The nature of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, A. (Ed.) (2001). The emergence of consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Garfield, J. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way (Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Humphreys, P. (1997). How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science, 64, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kronz, F. M., & Tiehen, J. T. (2002). Emergence and quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Science, 69, 324–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Minkel, J. R. (2002). The top-down universe. New Scientist, 175, 28.Google Scholar
  13. Morgan, C.L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate, IV, §20.Google Scholar
  14. Nietzsche, F. (1956). Wille zur Macht. Kröners Taschenausgabe, Alfred Kröner, XVI §483.Google Scholar
  15. Omnès, R. (1999). Understanding quantum mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Schrödinger, E. (1935). The present situation of quantum mechanics. In J. A. Wheeler, & W. H. Zurek (Eds.) English translation in section I.11 of quantum theory and measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. Silberstein, M., & McGeever, J. (1999). The search for ontological emergence. The philosophical Quarterly, 49, 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teller, P. (1995). An interpretive introduction to quantum field theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1974). On certainty 248. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Recherches en Epistémologie Appliquée, (CREA/Ecole Polytechnique)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations