Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 21–43

Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology


DOI: 10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7

Cite this article as:
Zahavi, D. Phenom Cogn Sci (2007) 6: 21. doi:10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7


Can phenomenology contribute to the burgeoning science of consciousness? Dennett’s reply would probably be that it very much depends upon the type of phenomenology in question. In my paper I discuss the relation between Dennett’s heterophenomenology and the type of classical philosophical phenomenology that one can find in Husserl, Scheler and Merleau-Ponty. I will in particular be looking at Dennett’s criticism of classical phenomenology. How vulnerable is it to Dennett’s criticism, and how much of a challenge does his own alternative constitute? I will argue that there are some rather marked differences between these two approaches to consciousness, but as I also hope to make clear, Dennett’s own account of where the differences are located is off target and ultimately based on a somewhat flawed conception of what classical phenomenology amounts to.

Key words

phenomenology introspection first-person perspective second-person perspective intersubjectivity 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish National Research Foundation: Center for Subjectivity ResearchUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations